Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 189384

Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Orion Poplawski <orion>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: gauret, lmacken
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-11 22:52:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779, 189338    

Description Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2006-04-19 16:44:10 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-ruledispatch.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-ruledispatch-0.5a0-0.svnr2115.src.rpm
Description: Something about generic functions in Python.

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2006-05-24 21:35:00 UTC
- I would suggest http://www.turbogears.org/download/index.html as the URL.  At
least it gives reference to TurboGears.

- md5sum matches
0bdec1022ad28a6819abc99e5f2e5b7c  RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev-r2115.tar.gz
0bdec1022ad28a6819abc99e5f2e5b7c  RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev-r2115.tar.gz.srpm

- spec is clean and readable.

Question:

- What's the latest about packaging/ghosting .pyo files?

Bad:

- doesn't build on x86_64, needs:

%{python_sitearch}/RuleDispatch-%{version}.dev_%{svnrev}-py%{pyver}.egg-info
%{python_sitearch}/dispatch          

instead of sitelib.
                   
- rpmlint:

W: python-ruledispatch invalid-license PSF or ZPL

This matches the PKG-INFO file, though the source file don't say anything.

W: python-ruledispatch invalid-url (none)

- see above.

E: python-ruledispatch zero-length
/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2115-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe
                       



Comment 2 Luke Macken 2006-07-07 15:53:56 UTC
Ignacio seems to be MIA, so I'll help push this one along.

http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-ruledispatch.spec
http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-ruledispatch-0.5a0-1.svnr2115.src.rpm

* Thu Jul  6 2006 Luke Macken <lmacken> 0.5a0-1.svnr2115
- Use sitearch instead of sitelib in the files
- Remove python-abi requirement
- Ghost the .pyo files
- Add the URL

Comment 3 Orion Poplawski 2006-07-07 22:41:21 UTC
- Release should have gone to 0.svnr2115.1, I think.

- Let's get a better %decription than "Something about generic functions in Python."

- Is zip-safe necessary?

E: python-ruledispatch zero-length
/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2115-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe
 

Comment 4 Aurelien Bompard 2006-07-08 13:57:34 UTC
> - Release should have gone to 0.svnr2115.1, I think.

According to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages)
(someone please fix this parenthesis) it should be :
0.1.svnr2115
If you want to bump the release without changing the version it will become
0.2.svnr2115

> - Is zip-safe necessary?

It looks like a dummy file to avoid the zip extractor bug were empty dirs are
not created. Harmless to remove, but harmless to keep also.
I would not consider it a blocker (sometimes one just has to ignore rpmlint's
warnings)

Comment 6 Orion Poplawski 2006-07-11 20:36:04 UTC
APPROVED.  Luke - are you going to be the maintainer now?

Comment 7 Luke Macken 2006-07-11 22:46:00 UTC
I have no problem maintaining this until Ignacio returns.

Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, FC{4,5} branches requested, tagged and
built for fc6.

Thanks!

(please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE; I don't have the privs)