Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 189384 - Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python
Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Orion Poplawski
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT 189338
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-04-19 16:44 UTC by Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-07-11 22:52:22 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2006-04-19 16:44:10 UTC
Spec URL:
Description: Something about generic functions in Python.

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2006-05-24 21:35:00 UTC
- I would suggest as the URL.  At
least it gives reference to TurboGears.

- md5sum matches

- spec is clean and readable.


- What's the latest about packaging/ghosting .pyo files?


- doesn't build on x86_64, needs:


instead of sitelib.
- rpmlint:

W: python-ruledispatch invalid-license PSF or ZPL

This matches the PKG-INFO file, though the source file don't say anything.

W: python-ruledispatch invalid-url (none)

- see above.

E: python-ruledispatch zero-length

Comment 2 Luke Macken 2006-07-07 15:53:56 UTC
Ignacio seems to be MIA, so I'll help push this one along.

* Thu Jul  6 2006 Luke Macken <lmacken> 0.5a0-1.svnr2115
- Use sitearch instead of sitelib in the files
- Remove python-abi requirement
- Ghost the .pyo files
- Add the URL

Comment 3 Orion Poplawski 2006-07-07 22:41:21 UTC
- Release should have gone to 0.svnr2115.1, I think.

- Let's get a better %decription than "Something about generic functions in Python."

- Is zip-safe necessary?

E: python-ruledispatch zero-length

Comment 4 Aurelien Bompard 2006-07-08 13:57:34 UTC
> - Release should have gone to 0.svnr2115.1, I think.

According to
(someone please fix this parenthesis) it should be :
If you want to bump the release without changing the version it will become

> - Is zip-safe necessary?

It looks like a dummy file to avoid the zip extractor bug were empty dirs are
not created. Harmless to remove, but harmless to keep also.
I would not consider it a blocker (sometimes one just has to ignore rpmlint's

Comment 6 Orion Poplawski 2006-07-11 20:36:04 UTC
APPROVED.  Luke - are you going to be the maintainer now?

Comment 7 Luke Macken 2006-07-11 22:46:00 UTC
I have no problem maintaining this until Ignacio returns.

Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, FC{4,5} branches requested, tagged and
built for fc6.


(please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE; I don't have the privs)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.