Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 191040
Summary: | Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Axel Thimm <axel.thimm> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Ville Skyttä <scop> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | pmatilai, scop | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-05-13 10:10:13 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Axel Thimm
2006-05-08 12:10:28 UTC
Created attachment 128787 [details]
Fix some whitespace issues
Some sort of whitespace-eating monster appears to have struck the spec, doesn't
build without this + one missing mkdir added.
Eeck. Fixed in Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt-5.89-2.src.rpm * Tue May 9 2006 Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm> - 5.89-2 - Fix whitespace (by Panu in bug #191040c1). Issues: - Shouldn't the package be noarch? - Missing dependency on apt (similar issue seems to exist in the corresponding smart package too, by the way) Cosmetics: - Summary and %description could mention Fedora even though it's in %{name}, and %description could be expanded a bit. - Upstream spelling is APT-RPM, that could be used in summary and description too Fixed in Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt.spec * Thu May 11 2006 Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm> - 5.89-3 - Apply comments from review #191040c3 (by Ville). - Fix summary and description - Config files are arch-independent, so we should become noarch - Create versioned dependency on apt (make sure it's repo-md capable) This creates a circular dependency which should not impose any issues. No SRPM seems to be available for 5.89-3, but if it's the same as -2 apart from the specfile changes, approved. Thanks for reviewing & approving. The package for devel has been queued in and I also tagged & built the matching apt package for devel. (apt will still need some cleansing and an upgrade to the next upstream release, which is estimated to happen soon, I'm building apt just to have something to use fedora-package-conf-apt with and not punch dependency holes in devel) Branches for FC-5 and FC-4 have been requested. |