Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1914524
| Summary: | Please build python-semver for EPEL 8 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
| Component: | python-semver | Assignee: | Raphael Groner <projects.rg> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | igor.raits, lbalhar, mhroncok, projects.rg |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | python-semver-2.13.0-3.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-03-07 23:15:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1913757 | ||
|
Description
Robert Scheck
2021-01-09 12:49:39 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 34 development cycle. Changing version to 34. Igor, may I kindly ask you for any response at all? Should I take over here? In assumption to do a review swap with bug #1913737 as python-semwer is an indirect dependency, see bug #1462467. If yes, please add me as co-maintainer. Lumir Balhar seems to be the new maintainer, according to recent scm commits. Scratch build successful. Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63020868 Could someone give me ACL to let me file branch request? Hello. Yes, the last few commits are mine but the main admin is only one and it's Igor. We (python-sig) have his blessing to merge what we think is necessary to keep his packages alive and compatible with recent Pythons. We can do that because few of the group members are proven packagers. Honestly, I have no idea whether a proven packager can request a new branch for a package they do not own and whether it's a good idea to give permissions without approval from the main admin. Miro, what do you think? Is the non-responsive maintainer policy the only way here? A provenpackager **must not** request an epel branch because that means the branch would have no maintainer. A nonresponsive policy is not the only way to proceed, there is also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Stalled_EPEL_Requests Okay, let's wait for another week then, to be of any fairness possible before going to file that rel-eng ticket for request of additional privileges. AFAIK Igor does not care about epel at all, he told me for several times in IRC. I've added Raphael as co-maintainer. Thanks. Branch requested. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32599 FEDORA-EPEL-2021-564eafe13e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-564eafe13e FEDORA-EPEL-2021-564eafe13e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |