Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1937698
Summary: | gcc: Remove libstdc++ symbols which are not going to be part of the GCC 11 upstream release | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Florian Weimer <fweimer> | |
Component: | gcc | Assignee: | Jonathan Wakely <jwakely> | |
Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 34 | CC: | aoliva, dmalcolm, fweimer, jakub, jwakely, kwizart, law, mpolacek, msebor, nickc, sipoyare | |
Target Milestone: | --- | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | All | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1937700 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | ||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | 1959316, 1959320, 1926594, 1959307, 1959310, 1959312, 1959319, 1959323 | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1937700 |
Description
Florian Weimer
2021-03-11 11:17:36 UTC
What is the best way to detect the usage of theses symbols in any (non-fedora) package ? rpm2cpio + readelf ? Eventually, having the range of the affected gcc compiler would help (or the first known good compiler) ? Thanks in advance. (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #1) > What is the best way to detect the usage of theses symbols in any > (non-fedora) package ? rpm2cpio + readelf ? Yes, that works. > Eventually, having the range of the affected gcc compiler would help (or the > first known good compiler) ? The broken std::call_once was committed upstream Nov 3 2020. Rawhide switched to gcc-11.0.0 in late November, so all versions of gcc-11.0.0 will create references to the broken symbols. The fixed gcc that doesn't create references to those symbols (but still has them in libstdc++.so for now) is gcc-11.0.1-0.2.fc34 / gcc-11.0.1-0.2.fc35 (but the earlier build, gcc-11.0.1-0.1, is still bad). |