Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 202836
Summary: | Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-18 05:54:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Hans de Goede
2006-08-16 17:48:49 UTC
The fRaBs review is bug 202837 I see upstream's website has title/header "Abuse-SDL", and upstream tarball is named abuse_sdl. My inclinication would be to stick with abuse_sdl for package name, but that's just me. (In reply to comment #2) > I see upstream's website has title/header "Abuse-SDL", and upstream tarball is > named abuse_sdl. My inclinication would be to stick with abuse_sdl for package > name, but that's just me. I can live with that too, but as said this really is THE abuse now these days hence my dropping of the -/_ sdl I don't want people to start looking for the main abuse package, cause there won't be one. But as said either way is eventually fine by me. Looks very good (and fun), APPROVED. One small thing, you should add %doc COPYING (In reply to comment #4) > Looks very good (and fun), APPROVED. > Thanks, imported and build, closing. > One small thing, you should add > %doc COPYING Woops, I forgot todo this, I've made the change in CVS now, a new version will be forthcoming shortly since there are some annoyances I wan't to fix (which require diving into the source first) such as -f to start fullscreen not working. |