Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 2035147

Summary:	Please branch and build libdwarf for EPEL9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michel Lind <michel>
Component:	libdwarf	Assignee:	Michel Lind <michel>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	davide, jitesh.1337, orion
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libdwarf-0.3.4-1.el9.1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-02-25 00:07:09 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2057217
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 1989755

Description Michel Lind 2021-12-23 04:56:47 UTC

libdwarf is in CRB/PowerTools for RHEL/CentOS 8: https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/centos/8-stream/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/

but it's not in RHEL/CentOS Stream 9: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms?filter=libdwarf

Could this be branched for EPEL 9? I'm happy to co-maintain (FAS: salimma), and also, if you add the epel-packagers-sig group to the ACL as collaborator on epel* branch, the EPEL Packagers SIG can help branch and build this for future EPEL releases.

Thanks!

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2021-12-23 22:55:12 UTC

I've added salimma and epel-packagers-sig to the package.

Comment 2 Michel Lind 2022-01-06 23:57:13 UTC

(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #1)
> I've added salimma and epel-packagers-sig to the package.

Thanks!

❯ fedpkg request-branch epel9                                
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40577

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2022-01-15 06:01:48 UTC

Debugging a build failure with the latest version from Rawhide. If I can't fix it I might just push the version from F35 first.

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 20:21:19 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 5 Michel Lind 2022-02-23 00:16:06 UTC

fixed the issue, awaiting Rawhide PR to be merged to make sure we don't diverge.

Comment 6 Michel Lind 2022-02-23 01:22:44 UTC

PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdwarf/pull-request/1

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-02-24 00:40:45 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-02-25 00:07:09 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.