Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 2035147 - Please branch and build libdwarf for EPEL9
Summary: Please branch and build libdwarf for EPEL9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libdwarf
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michel Lind
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2057217
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG 1989755
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-12-23 04:56 UTC by Michel Lind
Modified: 2022-02-25 00:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libdwarf-0.3.4-1.el9.1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-02-25 00:07:09 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michel Lind 2021-12-23 04:56:47 UTC 
libdwarf is in CRB/PowerTools for RHEL/CentOS 8: https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/centos/8-stream/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/

but it's not in RHEL/CentOS Stream 9: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms?filter=libdwarf

Could this be branched for EPEL 9? I'm happy to co-maintain (FAS: salimma), and also, if you add the epel-packagers-sig group to the ACL as collaborator on epel* branch, the EPEL Packagers SIG can help branch and build this for future EPEL releases.

Thanks!
Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2021-12-23 22:55:12 UTC 
I've added salimma and epel-packagers-sig to the package.
Comment 2 Michel Lind 2022-01-06 23:57:13 UTC 
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #1)
> I've added salimma and epel-packagers-sig to the package.

Thanks!

❯ fedpkg request-branch epel9                                
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40577
Comment 3 Michel Lind 2022-01-15 06:01:48 UTC 
Debugging a build failure with the latest version from Rawhide. If I can't fix it I might just push the version from F35 first.
Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 20:21:19 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.
Comment 5 Michel Lind 2022-02-23 00:16:06 UTC 
fixed the issue, awaiting Rawhide PR to be merged to make sure we don't diverge.
Comment 6 Michel Lind 2022-02-23 01:22:44 UTC 
PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdwarf/pull-request/1
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-02-24 00:40:45 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-02-25 00:07:09 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.