Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 216785
Summary: | Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chris Weyl <cweyl> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Parag AN(पराग) <panemade> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | panemade |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gnome2-Print/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-11-22 15:46:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Chris Weyl
2006-11-22 00:03:52 UTC
Tell me how can i use this package or test its working in FC6 core? There are a number of sample scripts that come in the examples directory (or, when the rpm is installed, under %doc). Running one or more of those should enable you to examine the functionailty of the module proper. Did mock build and found under build.log Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' Got some rpmlint Warnings W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl-autogen.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl-version.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. are those can be ignored for perl packages?? Those warnings can be safely ignored for perl packages. Not able to find license file(Is am i missing something)? Still Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' message coming not understanding which causes this message to appear? (In reply to comment #5) > Not able to find license file(Is am i missing something)? Yes, you are missing something: Nobody is obliged to ship one. Perl module files typically contain licenses embedded into their source files. > Still Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' message coming > not understanding which causes this message to appear? IIRC, this is a bug/crappy code somewhere in some of the perl-Gtk/Gnome infrastructure. I recall this had appeared several times before, but I don't recall all details on how this had been resolved. Googling/searching bugzilla might provide further insights. Does that be a blocker? (In reply to comment #7) > Does that be a blocker? I just found a reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166252 ... so people seem to preferr to ignore this bug :( Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and but NOT for RPMS. But those warnings are ignored. + source files match upstream. 66578c2ffaebbe035a0735e65ad71c3f Gnome2-Print-1.000.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. Don't Forget to CLOSE this with NEXTRELEASE Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC5,6. Thanks for the review! :) |