Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 245463
| Summary: | please add %{arm} to pm-utils's list of build archs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh> |
| Component: | pm-utils | Assignee: | Phil Knirsch <pknirsch> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | opensource, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-09-13 04:33:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 245418 | ||
Imho it should be "%{?arm}", so it gets expanded to nothing when it is nod
defined. At least this is what happens here locally with rpm --eval.
Thanks for your reply.
The rawhide version of rpm does define %{arm}. That said, if you use the
same spec file for rawhide and pre-rawhide, then %{?arm} would make more
sense, yes. Note that rpm, gcc, binutils and such packages do use %{arm}
in their spec files.
I have added %{?arm} to ExclusiveArch in cvs. Can you rebuild the package for
arm to test, whether it really builds? I guess you do not need radeontool or
vditool for arm, or do you? They are both only built for %{ix86} x86_64.
radeontool and vbetool are now a separate packages and do not use ExclusiveArch. pm-utils is now rebuild. |
pm-utils is currently not built for arm, but there's not really any reason why it shouldn't. Would you please consider adding the string "%{arm}" (which is an rpm macro that expands to the set of supported arm sub-archs) to pm-utils's ExclusiveArch: line? Thanks for your time.