Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 245463 - please add %{arm} to pm-utils's list of build archs
Summary: please add %{arm} to pm-utils's list of build archs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pm-utils
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Phil Knirsch
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: ARMTracker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-06-23 16:21 UTC by Lennert Buytenhek
Modified: 2015-03-05 01:18 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-09-13 04:33:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lennert Buytenhek 2007-06-23 16:21:21 UTC
pm-utils is currently not built for arm, but there's not really any reason
why it shouldn't.

Would you please consider adding the string "%{arm}" (which is an rpm
macro that expands to the set of supported arm sub-archs) to pm-utils's
ExclusiveArch: line?

Thanks for your time.

Comment 1 Till Maas 2007-08-30 15:35:10 UTC
Imho it should be "%{?arm}", so it gets expanded to nothing when it is nod
defined. At least this is what happens here locally with rpm --eval.

Comment 2 Lennert Buytenhek 2007-08-31 06:28:23 UTC
Thanks for your reply.

The rawhide version of rpm does define %{arm}.  That said, if you use the
same spec file for rawhide and pre-rawhide, then %{?arm} would make more
sense, yes.  Note that rpm, gcc, binutils and such packages do use %{arm}
in their spec files.

Comment 3 Till Maas 2007-08-31 08:52:44 UTC
I have added %{?arm} to ExclusiveArch in cvs. Can you rebuild the package for
arm to test, whether it really builds? I guess you do not need radeontool or
vditool for arm, or do you? They are both only built for %{ix86} x86_64.

Comment 4 Till Maas 2007-09-13 04:33:49 UTC
radeontool and vbetool are now a separate packages and do not use ExclusiveArch.
pm-utils is now rebuild.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.