Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 511917
| Summary: | Add lshw | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Juha Tuomala <tuju> |
| Component: | lshw | Assignee: | Juha Tuomala <tuju> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | el5 | CC: | terjeros, tuju |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-cvs+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | B.02.12.01-1.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-08-05 17:20:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Juha Tuomala
2009-07-15 16:43:17 UTC
f10.src.rpm koji results in dist-5E-epel target: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1476599 x86_64 cli version appears to work fine. > I need lshw in EPEL, do you want to package it or should i take care of it? I don't do EPEL packages of any package at the moment. > or should i take care of it? Yes, please :-) - Terje (In reply to comment #3) > > I need lshw in EPEL, do you want to package it or should i take care of it? > > or should i take care of it? > > Yes, please :-) Okay :) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lshw New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: terjeros tuju One thing what needs to be resolved, that how can we prevent that sub-package from appearing in EPEL? I really don't think it's worth of dragging all those gui dependencies into server platform, especially when all changes in the future should be kept in minimal. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies > have a mostly stable set of packages that normally does not change > at all and only changes if there are good reasons for changes. sure the gui stuff remains as such too, but perhaps we could do some %if magic in spec for EL versions? What do you think? CVS done. lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lshw'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0105 (In reply to comment #6) > CVS done. Tibbs, btw, did you notice that cvs request was for EL-4 too? cvs done. lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |