Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 511917 - Add lshw
Summary: Add lshw
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: lshw
Version: el5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Juha Tuomala
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-07-15 16:43 UTC by Juha Tuomala
Modified: 2009-08-05 17:20 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: B.02.12.01-1.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-05 17:20:13 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
kevin: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Juha Tuomala 2009-07-15 16:43:17 UTC 
Description of problem:
I need lshw in EPEL, do you want to package it or should i take care of it?
Comment 1 Juha Tuomala 2009-07-15 16:58:55 UTC 
f10.src.rpm koji results in dist-5E-epel target:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1476599
Comment 2 Juha Tuomala 2009-07-15 17:11:30 UTC 
x86_64 cli version appears to work fine.
Comment 3 Terje Røsten 2009-07-15 20:20:37 UTC 
> I need lshw in EPEL, do you want to package it or should i take care of it?  

I don't do EPEL packages of any package at the moment.


> or should i take care of it? 

Yes, please :-)


 - Terje
Comment 4 Juha Tuomala 2009-07-16 07:57:30 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> > I need lshw in EPEL, do you want to package it or should i take care of it?  
> > or should i take care of it? 
> 
> Yes, please :-)

Okay :)

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: lshw
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Owners: terjeros tuju
Comment 5 Juha Tuomala 2009-07-16 08:04:11 UTC 
One thing what needs to be resolved, that how can we prevent that sub-package from appearing in EPEL? I really don't think it's worth of dragging all those gui dependencies into server platform, especially when all changes in the future should be kept in minimal. 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies
> have a mostly stable set of packages that normally does not change 
> at all and only changes if there are good reasons for changes.

sure the gui stuff remains as such too, but perhaps we could do some %if magic in spec for EL versions? What do you think?
Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-17 15:26:08 UTC 
CVS done.
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2009-07-20 12:02:44 UTC 
lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2009-07-20 16:57:09 UTC 
lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lshw'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0105
Comment 9 Juha Tuomala 2009-07-20 17:30:03 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> CVS done.  

Tibbs, btw, did you notice that cvs request was for EL-4 too?
Comment 10 Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-26 19:47:22 UTC 
cvs done.
Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 17:20:08 UTC 
lshw-B.02.12.01-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.