Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 569080

Summary: [abrt] crash in gnote-0.7.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/gnote was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Cia Watson <cia.watson>
Component: 0xFFFFAssignee: Rahul Sundaram <metherid>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: dodji, dwmw2, jspaleta, metherid
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:7a007c1b6ac2be275ccba55a5ed538d5ab9a5e11
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-01 04:14:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Cia Watson 2010-02-28 00:25:54 UTC 
abrt 1.0.8 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/gnote --panel-applet --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GnoteApplet_Factory --oaf-ior-fd=30
comment: Newly installed Fedora 13 alpha, thought I'd try to add a note about something.
component: gnote
executable: /usr/bin/gnote
kernel: 2.6.33-1.fc13.i686.PAE
package: gnote-0.7.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/gnote was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Rawhide)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Click on Gnote on panel
2. Select option to add a new note
3. It tells me it closed and abrt adds a pretty flashing red light to my panel.  :-)
Comment 1 Cia Watson 2010-02-28 00:25:56 UTC 
Created attachment 396810 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Rahul Sundaram 2010-02-28 06:56:10 UTC 
A stack trace would be useful as the current attached one is incomplete and the manual process is described at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces
Comment 3 Cia Watson 2010-02-28 20:11:28 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> A stack trace would be useful as the current attached one is incomplete and the
> manual process is described at
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces    

It looks like this is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568905 created by Adam W.Though that one is on the x86_64 platform and mine's i386 / 686. If you still want the backtrace please advise.

or I can close this but I'm not sure how to do that pointing to it being a dupe.
Comment 4 Cia Watson 2010-02-28 20:13:39 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>  
> or I can close this but I'm not sure how to do that pointing to it being a
> dupe.    

I see below the comment area there is a link to mark it as a duplicate which I can do if you want?
Comment 5 Rahul Sundaram 2010-03-01 04:14:24 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 568905 ***