Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 569080 - [abrt] crash in gnote-0.7.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/gnote was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gnote-0.7.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/gnote was killed by sign...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 568905
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: 0xFFFF
Version: rawhide
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rahul Sundaram
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:7a007c1b6ac2be275ccba55a5ed...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-02-28 00:25 UTC by Cia Watson
Modified: 2010-03-01 04:14 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-01 04:14:24 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (deleted)
2010-02-28 00:25 UTC, Cia Watson 		no flags Details
View All

Description Cia Watson 2010-02-28 00:25:54 UTC 
abrt 1.0.8 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/gnote --panel-applet --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GnoteApplet_Factory --oaf-ior-fd=30
comment: Newly installed Fedora 13 alpha, thought I'd try to add a note about something.
component: gnote
executable: /usr/bin/gnote
kernel: 2.6.33-1.fc13.i686.PAE
package: gnote-0.7.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/gnote was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Rawhide)

How to reproduce
-----
1. Click on Gnote on panel
2. Select option to add a new note
3. It tells me it closed and abrt adds a pretty flashing red light to my panel.  :-)
Comment 1 Cia Watson 2010-02-28 00:25:56 UTC 
Created attachment 396810 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Rahul Sundaram 2010-02-28 06:56:10 UTC 
A stack trace would be useful as the current attached one is incomplete and the manual process is described at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces
Comment 3 Cia Watson 2010-02-28 20:11:28 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> A stack trace would be useful as the current attached one is incomplete and the
> manual process is described at
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces    

It looks like this is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568905 created by Adam W.Though that one is on the x86_64 platform and mine's i386 / 686. If you still want the backtrace please advise.

or I can close this but I'm not sure how to do that pointing to it being a dupe.
Comment 4 Cia Watson 2010-02-28 20:13:39 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>  
> or I can close this but I'm not sure how to do that pointing to it being a
> dupe.    

I see below the comment area there is a link to mark it as a duplicate which I can do if you want?
Comment 5 Rahul Sundaram 2010-03-01 04:14:24 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 568905 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.