Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 65939

Summary: clock runs extra fast
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component: kernelAssignee: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: mingo, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-10-17 03:52:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 67218, 79579, 100644    
Attachments:
Description Flags
dmidecode output
none
lspci output
none
dmesg output
none
/proc/interrupts none

Description Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 15:54:12 UTC
With 2.4.18-0.40smp, the clock on this machine runs (roughly) twice as fast.

If booted with 'noapic', it works OK.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 16:01:11 UTC
Created attachment 59524 [details]
dmidecode output

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 16:01:43 UTC
Created attachment 59525 [details]
lspci output

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 16:01:55 UTC
Created attachment 59527 [details]
dmesg output

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 16:02:14 UTC
Created attachment 59529 [details]
/proc/interrupts

Comment 5 Arjan van de Ven 2002-06-05 09:49:08 UTC
Ingo: could this be that the timer irq is routed to 2 cpu's ?

Comment 6 Jay Turner 2002-11-20 20:30:21 UTC
Can we close this out now?

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2002-11-20 20:32:51 UTC
Well, depends how well the current kernel works on this box. Haven't tried recently.

Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-17 03:52:53 UTC
Deferred, I think that box is dead.