Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 65939 - clock runs extra fast
Summary: clock runs extra fast
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel
Version: 9
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Arjan van de Ven
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 67218 79579 CambridgeTarget
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-06-04 15:54 UTC by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-17 02:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-10-17 03:52:53 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
dmidecode output (deleted)
2002-06-04 16:01 UTC, Bill Nottingham 		no flags Details
lspci output (deleted)
2002-06-04 16:01 UTC, Bill Nottingham 		no flags Details
dmesg output (deleted)
2002-06-04 16:01 UTC, Bill Nottingham 		no flags Details
/proc/interrupts (deleted)
2002-06-04 16:02 UTC, Bill Nottingham 		no flags Details
View All

Description Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 15:54:12 UTC 
With 2.4.18-0.40smp, the clock on this machine runs (roughly) twice as fast.

If booted with 'noapic', it works OK.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 16:01:11 UTC 
Created attachment 59524 [details]
dmidecode output
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 16:01:43 UTC 
Created attachment 59525 [details]
lspci output
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 16:01:55 UTC 
Created attachment 59527 [details]
dmesg output
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 16:02:14 UTC 
Created attachment 59529 [details]
/proc/interrupts
Comment 5 Arjan van de Ven 2002-06-05 09:49:08 UTC 
Ingo: could this be that the timer irq is routed to 2 cpu's ?
Comment 6 Jay Turner 2002-11-20 20:30:21 UTC 
Can we close this out now?
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2002-11-20 20:32:51 UTC 
Well, depends how well the current kernel works on this box. Haven't tried recently.
Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-17 03:52:53 UTC 
Deferred, I think that box is dead.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.