Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1001266 - sunpinyin : duplicate documentation files / potentially conflicting
Summary: sunpinyin : duplicate documentation files / potentially conflicting
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: sunpinyin
Version: 26
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Liang Suilong
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F20UnversionedDocDirs
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-26 19:57 UTC by Michael Schwendt
Modified: 2023-09-12 00:24 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-05-29 12:05:17 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Schwendt 2013-08-26 19:57:50 UTC 
Duplicate documentation files have been detected in the package
builds for Rawhide and Fedora 20. The likely cause is the unversioned
docdirs change in Fedora 20.

If your package %installs documentation files into %{_docdir}/%{name}/ to
store them in a subpackage, this now conflicts with using the %doc
macro in the base package. Since Fedora 20, the %doc macro installs into
the unversioned %{_docdir}/%{name}/ and includes everything in that
directory. One obvious fix is to decide between either using %doc or
installing into %{_docdir}/%{name}/ manually as explained in the
Packaging tricks Wiki section (for past dist releases and the versioned
docdir).

General discussion of this problem:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338

Further information:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Installing_documentation:_2_paths

[semi-automated bug report]

[...]

=> sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.src.rpm
=> sunpinyin-data-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.i686 in fedora-development-i386
  File conflict with: sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.i686
     /usr/share/doc/sunpinyin/SLM-inst.mk
     /usr/share/doc/sunpinyin/SLM-train.mk

=> sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.src.rpm
=> sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.i686 in fedora-development-i386
  File conflict with: sunpinyin-data-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.i686
     /usr/share/doc/sunpinyin/SLM-inst.mk
     /usr/share/doc/sunpinyin/SLM-train.mk
Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:00:45 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22
Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2015-10-18 07:38:00 UTC 
sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.14.fc23 is still affected.
Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2015-12-29 20:06:15 UTC 
Fix committed to Rawhide.

Unfortunately, it didn't even build anymore with the new pod2man. I've added a couple of more fixes to the spec file as well.

Is anyone still taking care of the "sunpinyin" Fedora package?
Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 13:13:20 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase
Comment 5 Fedora End Of Life 2017-07-25 18:34:49 UTC 
This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '24'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-03 08:56:11 UTC 
This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '26'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
Comment 7 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-29 12:05:17 UTC 
Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26
is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any
further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-12 00:24:14 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.