Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1045884 - [Tracking ticket] - Update to ZeroMQ v4
Summary: [Tracking ticket] - Update to ZeroMQ v4
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: zeromq
Version: 22
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Thomas Spura
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 990423 1069556 1145100 1165553 1165554 1165555
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-22 20:05 UTC by Jose Pedro Oliveira
Modified: 2016-05-25 16:35 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: zeromq-4.0.5-1.fc22
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-25 16:35:18 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jose Pedro Oliveira 2013-12-22 20:05:40 UTC 
Description of problem:
Tracking ticket for the the update of ZeroMQ to version 4.

Expected results:
 * new package zeromq4 that obsoletes the package zeromq3

Additional info:

 * ZeroMQ v4 new requirement:
   libsodium (review ticket: bug #990423)

 * ZeroMQ v4.0.3 download link:
   http://download.zeromq.org/zeromq-4.0.3.tar.gz

 * API compatibility report for the libzmq library
   between 3.2.4 and 4.0.3 versions on x86_64:
   http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt/fedora/compat_reports/libzmq/3.2.4_to_4.0.3/compat_report.html

 * ZeroMQ 3.2.4 dynamic library:
   zeromq-3.2.4/src/.libs/libzmq.so.3.0.0

 * ZeroMQ 4.0.3 dynamic library:
   zeromq-4.0.3/src/.libs/libzmq.so.3.1.0

 * SONAME bump between 3.2.4 and 4.0.3 versions:
   from 3.0.0 to 3.1.0
Comment 1 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2013-12-22 21:30:18 UTC 
zeromq 4.0.3 specfile and SRPM (work in progress):

 * http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt/fedora/zeromq4-4.0.3-0.2.fc19.src.rpm
 * http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt/fedora/zeromq4/zeromq4-4.0.3-0.2.fc19.x86_64/zeromq4.spec

Current status:
 * builds successfully in mock for Fedora 19, Fedora 20 and EPEL 6

Todo list:
 * zeromq4 should obsolete the zeromq3 package
 * file '/usr/bin/curve_keygen' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]

Major caveat:
 * The test suite starts to fail if I try to handle the rpath problem in curve_keygen (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPath_Packaging_Draft)
Comment 2 Thomas Spura 2014-02-04 08:00:40 UTC 
Changes:
- disable silent rules in configure
- delete rpath with chrpath

This method of deleting rpath works with the test suite and we are now down to one last failing test:

PASS: test_timeo
../config/test-driver: line 95:  9265 Aborted                 (core dumped) "$@" > $log_file 2>&1
FAIL: test_fork
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/tomspur/rpmbuild/BUILD/zeromq-4.0.3/tests'
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/tomspur/rpmbuild/BUILD/zeromq-4.0.3/tests'
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for zeromq 4.0.3
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 43
# PASS:  42
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

- I added provides/requires for zeromq3, but with the version of zeromq4 as I think that's appropriate. What do you think?

The spec can be found here: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zeromq4.spec

Do you want to open a review request for zeromq4 or should I do it?
Comment 3 Thomas Spura 2014-02-25 09:44:48 UTC 
(In reply to Thomas Spura from comment #2)
> Do you want to open a review request for zeromq4 or should I do it?

The review request can be found at bug #1069556.
Comment 4 Thomas Spura 2014-11-14 13:42:46 UTC 
zeromq2 just hit rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8142278

I'll update the zeromq package to version 4 next week. If packages cannot be (easily) rebuild with it, they can then BR zeromq2 instead.
Comment 5 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 16:57:46 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.