Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 105384 - yet another oops. this time in Using_Versions
Summary: yet another oops. this time in Using_Versions
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel
Version: beta2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dave Jones
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: CambridgeBlocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-09-25 16:12 UTC by Mike McLean
Modified: 2015-01-04 22:03 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-10-22 17:40:31 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mike McLean 2003-09-25 16:12:41 UTC 
* Severn-0.94.1
* Proliant ML370

console was locked up, this is what was on it:

CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<551199cd>]   Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010082

EIP is at Using_Versions [] 0x551199cc (2.4.22-1.2061.nptlsmp)
eax: dd3c0000   ebx: c040b380   ecx: 00000000   edx: 00000000
esi: df70be7c   edi: 00000092   ebp: dd3c0000   esp: df70be54
ds: 0068   es: 0068   ss: 0068
Process mingetty (pid: 1667, stackpage=df70b000)
Stack: 0000001e ff1199cd 0000001e 00000000 00000001 00000001 00000092 dd3c1ebc
       dfad0bb4 dfad0bb0 df70beac 00000282 dd3c0000 00000003 00000000 00000000
       00000001 00000282 00000003 dfad0b94 dfad0ba0 dfad0c64 dfad0c70 c01677e2
Call Trace:   [<c01677e2>] locks_wake_up_blocks [kernel] 0x92 (0xdf70beb0)
[<c016855d>] posix_lock_file [kernel] 0x3fd (0xdf70bee8)
[<c0133a0b>] sys_rt_sigaction [kernel] 0x8b (0xdf70bf60)
[<c012ab7e>] do_setitimer [kernel] 0xae (0xdf70bf74)
[<c0109eff>] system_call [kernel] 0x33 (0xdf70bfc0)


Code:  Bad EIP value
Comment 1 Dave Jones 2003-09-29 01:13:05 UTC 
Can you try and repeat with 2075 please ?
Comment 2 Dave Jones 2003-10-21 22:25:24 UTC 
ping ?
Comment 3 Mike McLean 2003-10-22 17:40:31 UTC 
I don't really have a repeater for this bug, but I haven't seen it lately.  I'll
close it for now and reopen if I see the oops again.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.