Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1068229 - jboss-jsf-2.1-api: Switch to java-headless (build)requires
Summary: jboss-jsf-2.1-api: Switch to java-headless (build)requires
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: jboss-jsf-2.1-api
Version: 21
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marek Goldmann
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1085433 1106882
Blocks: 1067528
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-02-21 12:50 UTC by Stanislav Ochotnicky
Modified: 2015-02-23 07:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: jboss-jsf-2.1-api-2.0.2-10.fc21
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-23 07:59:13 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Stanislav Ochotnicky 2014-02-21 12:50:47 UTC
jboss-jsf-2.1-api or one of its subpackages currently Requires and/or BuildRequires
java. OpenJDK package has been split and most packages should now Require
package 'java-headless' instead. Requires and BuildRequires on java-devel remain
unchanged.

Few exceptions where packages can not use java-headless but must keep using
full java package.
 * software using Java awt subsystem
 * software using Java sound subsystem

Your options:
1. Leave this bug untouched and after March 17th 2014 an automated tool will
   migrate this package to java-headless and run a rebuild in Fedora Rawhide.
2. Change bug to 'Assigned' if you plan to review and migrate to java-headless
   manually. Automated tool will not touch bugs that are not in NEW state.

See tracking bug #1067528 or Headless Java change proposal[1] and Java Packaging
guidelines[2] for more details about this change.

If you have more questions about this change feel free to ask on java-devel
mailing list[3] or #fedora-java Freenode IRC channel (mostly 9:00-18:00 CET).


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HeadlessJava
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java\#BuildRequires_and_Requires
[3] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/

Comment 1 Mikolaj Izdebski 2014-03-28 21:12:35 UTC
Fixed in jboss-jsf-2.1-api-2.0.2-8

Comment 2 Mikolaj Izdebski 2014-09-29 08:23:54 UTC
This feature was implemented and checked into SCM by me, but there is no build containing it as the package doesn't build in Fedora 21 (see the FTBFS bug referenced in "depends on"). Since I am not package owner and there is nothing I can do, I'm reassigning to component owner.

Comment 3 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2014-12-11 12:09:27 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2015-02-12 09:55:29 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2015-02-13 16:47:12 UTC
jboss-jsf-2.1-api-2.0.2-10.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jboss-jsf-2.1-api-2.0.2-10.fc21

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2015-02-15 03:08:21 UTC
Package jboss-jsf-2.1-api-2.0.2-10.fc21:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing jboss-jsf-2.1-api-2.0.2-10.fc21'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1988/jboss-jsf-2.1-api-2.0.2-10.fc21
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2015-02-23 07:59:13 UTC
jboss-jsf-2.1-api-2.0.2-10.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.