Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1106302 - freetalk: FTBFS in rawhide
Summary: freetalk: FTBFS in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: freetalk
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Meng
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 914012 992294 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: F19FTBFS F20FTBFS F21FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-06-09 04:36 UTC by Dennis Gilmore
Modified: 2014-07-03 15:44 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: freetalk-4.0-0.1.rc4.fc21
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-03 15:44:09 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (7.72 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 04:36 UTC, Dennis Gilmore
no flags Details
root.log (83.15 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 04:36 UTC, Dennis Gilmore
no flags Details
state.log (1.06 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 04:36 UTC, Dennis Gilmore
no flags Details

Description Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 04:36:32 UTC
Your package freetalk failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6965306

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 04:36:34 UTC
Created attachment 904465 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 04:36:36 UTC
Created attachment 904466 [details]
root.log

Comment 3 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 04:36:37 UTC
Created attachment 904467 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Alphonse Steiner 2014-06-26 19:18:19 UTC
The build is failing since guile 2.0. It is easy to fix:
Add the patch: freetalk-3.2-compat-guile18.patch 
===============================================================================
--- configure.ac.orig   2014-06-26 21:04:52.941891816 +0200
+++ configure.ac        2014-06-26 21:05:47.005888500 +0200
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 
 AC_SEARCH_LIBS([tgetent],[ncurses termcap curses])
 AC_CHECK_LIB([readline], [readline],,AC_MSG_ERROR([ERROR! readline not found...]))
-GUILE_FLAGS
+GUILE1_8_FLAGS
 AC_CHECK_LIB([guile],[scm_boot_guile],,AC_MSG_ERROR([ERROR! Guile 1.6 or above required.]))
 
 AC_CHECK_PROG([PKGCONFIG], [pkg-config], [yes], [no])
===============================================================================
And update the spec file:
===============================================================================
--- freetalk.spec.orig    2014-06-26 20:29:56.147020405 +0200
+++ freetalk.spec 2014-06-26 21:03:56.206895295 +0200
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 Source0:       http://sv.gnu.org/download/freetalk/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
 
 Patch0:                %{name}-%{version}-glibc210.patch
+Patch1:     freetalk-3.2-compat-guile18.patch
 
 BuildRoot:     %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
@@ -16,9 +17,10 @@
 Requires(preun): info
 
 BuildRequires: gettext
-BuildRequires: guile-devel
+BuildRequires: compat-guile18-devel
 BuildRequires: loudmouth-devel
 BuildRequires: readline-devel
+BuildRequires:  autoconf, automake
 
 %description
 GNU Freetalk is a console based Jabber client. It features a readline interface
@@ -28,8 +30,10 @@
 %prep
 %setup -q
 %patch0 -p1
+%patch1 -p0
 
 %build
+./autogen.sh
 %configure --disable-rpath
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
===============================================================================

Comment 5 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2014-07-02 08:45:09 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 6 Christopher Meng 2014-07-03 13:42:26 UTC
*** Bug 914012 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Christopher Meng 2014-07-03 13:42:28 UTC
*** Bug 992294 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.