It was intentionally left out from fontawesome-fonts package because of fedora fonts packaging policy.

I'm actually not sure if it would be OK to include it (and .eot, .svg variants) to the *-web package. If so, it would also require a symlink or something to the .ttf file otherwise the .ttf link would be broken. 

The *-web package might require even more love. For instance the directory name with version in it is not really good. 

Also the "css" dir should probably be in "/usr/share/web-assets/fontawesome" [1].

If it's possible, I suggest to use font definition as follows:

@font-face {
  font-family: 'FontAwesome';
  src:  url('@{fa-font-path}/fontawesome-webfont.ttf?v=@{fa-version}') format('truetype');
  font-weight: normal;
  font-style: normal;
}

I'm open to suggestions to make the packaging right.

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets

(In reply to Petr Vobornik from comment #1)
> It was intentionally left out from fontawesome-fonts package because of
> fedora fonts packaging policy.

ok. Didn't know that.

> I'm actually not sure if it would be OK to include it (and .eot, .svg
> variants) to the *-web package. If so, it would also require a symlink or
> something to the .ttf file otherwise the .ttf link would be broken. 
> 
> The *-web package might require even more love. For instance the directory
> name with version in it is not really good. 
> 
> Also the "css" dir should probably be in "/usr/share/web-assets/fontawesome"
> [1].
> 
> If it's possible, I suggest to use font definition as follows:
> 
> @font-face {
>   font-family: 'FontAwesome';
>   src:  url('@{fa-font-path}/fontawesome-webfont.ttf?v=@{fa-version}')
> format('truetype');
>   font-weight: normal;
>   font-style: normal;
> }

ipython has a .less file and seems to generate a .min.css file from that.
I'll need to see to maybe regenerate the .min.css file, then your suggestion from above should be "found" automatically. As they currently have that woff file around, the .min.css generating script seems to automatically at it too.

Thanks!

I guess this can be closed then, if the woff file is indeed missing on purpose...

fontawesome-fonts-4.1.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontawesome-fonts-4.1.0-2.el7

fontawesome-fonts-4.1.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontawesome-fonts-4.1.0-2.fc21

fontawesome-fonts-4.1.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

fontawesome-fonts-4.1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

On Fedora 21, I'm getting:

WARNING:tornado.access:404 GET /static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.ttf?v=4.1.0 

package fontawesome-fonts-4.1.0-2.fc21. More information on stackoverflow question (because I'm not certain whether the fault is in the packaging or the software...): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28733313/ipython-notebook-2-3-0-on-fedora-21-cannot-find-fontawesome 

This is not precisely the same error, but seems related. Shall I file a new bug or shall we continue here?

Bryce, I can confirm, this issue is now fixed with OpenStack Horizon.

@tomspur, can you comment here?

It seems to work fine over here.

What is the output of:
rpm -qa | grep ipython | sort

and
ls -l /usr/lib/python?.?/site-packages/IPython/html/static/components/font-awesome/font{,/}

(In reply to Thomas Spura from comment #9)
> It seems to work fine over here.
> 
> What is the output of:
> rpm -qa | grep ipython | sort

[fedora@lugosi ~]$ rpm -qa | grep ipython | sort
python-ipython-console-2.3.0-1.fc21.noarch
python-ipython-notebook-2.3.0-1.fc21.noarch


> 
> and
> ls -l
> /usr/lib/python?.?/site-packages/IPython/html/static/components/font-awesome/
> font{,/}

[fedora@lugosi ~]$ ls -l /usr/lib/python?.?/site-packages/IPython/html/static/components/font-awesome/font{,/}
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root   28 Nov 15 00:09 /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/IPython/html/static/components/font-awesome/font -> /usr/share/fonts/fontawesome

/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/IPython/html/static/components/font-awesome/font/:
total 548
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root  75188 Jul  3  2014 FontAwesome.otf
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 253487 Jul  3  2014 fontawesome-webfont.svg
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 141564 Dec  5 13:37 fontawesome-webfont.ttf
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root  83760 Jul  3  2014 fontawesome-webfont.woff

Just curious if I should create a new bug against the ipython fedora package?

Yes, please open a new bug against ipython.

I think this was working in 2.2, but with the recent update to 2.3 it seems the notbook broke unfortunately...

I'll reopen this bug because the mentioned changes breaks execution of sphinx to generate documentation in RHEL7.

Error: [('/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.svg', '/builddir/build/BUILD/jpype-0.6.2/html/_static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.svg', "[Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.svg'"), ('/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.woff', '/builddir/build/BUILD/jpype-0.6.2/html/_static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.woff', "[Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.woff'"), ('/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.eot', '/builddir/build/BUILD/jpype-0.6.2/html/_static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.eot', "[Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.eot'")]
The full traceback has been saved in /tmp/sphinx-err-5erdKL.log, if you want to report the issue to the developers.
Please also report this if it was a user error, so that a better error message can be provided next time.
Either send bugs to the mailing list at <http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev/>,
or report them in the tracker at <http://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/issues/>. Thanks!

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21258667

For reproducibility, you can try to build e.g. jpype from old git (disabled sphinx in HEAD):
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jpype/c/1163c5afa3b2eee812096ba2520361646edc0c44?branch=epel7

Please let me know if I should report this issue to Red Hat service.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110646#c13 has nothing to do with the rest of this bug. If you think, you have an issue, please report a new bug. Thank you.