Ping?

There was a packaged rebase to 0.90, but somebody reverted it:

commit 634063ccfcb3d8dfd9c64f667885647c6ab6ec36
Author: Oliver Falk <oliver>
Date:   Mon Sep 30 09:42:42 2013 +0200

    * Downgrade - as in f20
[...]
 %changelog
+* Tue Sep 17 2013 Oliver Falk <oliver> - 1:0.17-5.2
+- Fix requires (epoch)
+
+* Tue Sep 17 2013 Oliver Falk <oliver> - 1:0.17-5.1
+- Fix BZ#1008491 - too many broken deps
+

There are not much reverse dependencies:

# repoquery --whatrequires 'libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit)' --source | sort -uf
bwm-ng-0.6-16.fc22.src.rpm
libstatgrab-0.17-7.fc22.2.src.rpm
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-23.1.fc22.src.rpm
player-3.0.2-37.fc21.src.rpm
pystatgrab-0.5-15.fc22.src.rpm
razorqt-0.5.2-21.fc22.src.rpm

(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3)
> There are not much reverse dependencies:
> 
> # repoquery --whatrequires 'libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit)' --source | sort -uf
> bwm-ng-0.6-16.fc22.src.rpm
> libstatgrab-0.17-7.fc22.2.src.rpm
> perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-23.1.fc22.src.rpm
> player-3.0.2-37.fc21.src.rpm
> pystatgrab-0.5-15.fc22.src.rpm
> razorqt-0.5.2-21.fc22.src.rpm

The reason that I left it there is that bwm-ng is not usable if I update this to 0.91.

Some APIs have been rewritten. I need to port the bwm-ng or they will be retired. But there are users still so I can't do that.

I'm seeking time to fix the package, it's a bit tough now.

https://www.freshports.org/net-mgmt/bwm-ng/

(In reply to Tim Orling from comment #5)
> https://www.freshports.org/net-mgmt/bwm-ng/

the patch is merge in upstream repository at https://github.com/vgropp/bwm-ng

Another option would be to remove libstatgrab dependency since its only optional for bwm-ng (configure --without-libstatgrab)

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)

> The reason that I left it there is that bwm-ng is not usable if I update
> this to 0.91.
> 
> Some APIs have been rewritten. I need to port the bwm-ng or they will be
> retired. But there are users still so I can't do that.
> 
> I'm seeking time to fix the package, it's a bit tough now.

Can you create a scratch build of 0.91 for f23 or devel?

I'll then test the bwm-ng patch against this and if it works the upgrade can proceed for devel.

Seemed the fix is so simple ;-) Can't believe that.

I will scratch a build when I have time, don't worry.

Created attachment 1058790 [details]
libstatgrab.spec update to 0.91

koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10588067

Git URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ttorling/public_git/libstatgrab.git/

Spec URL: https://ttorling.fedorapeople.org/libstatgrab/libstatgrab.spec

SRPM URL: https://ttorling.fedorapeople.org/libstatgrab/libstatgrab-0.91-1.fc24.2.src.rpm

koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10761736

(In reply to Tim Orling from comment #11)
> Git URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ttorling/public_git/libstatgrab.git/
> 
> Spec URL: https://ttorling.fedorapeople.org/libstatgrab/libstatgrab.spec
> 
> SRPM URL:
> https://ttorling.fedorapeople.org/libstatgrab/libstatgrab-0.91-1.fc24.2.src.
> rpm
> 
> koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10761736

Please do not upload sources to the git, I've uploaded on Tuesday.

I'm cleaning up the spec now, since the way it got packaged is a bit odd.

Also upstream of it is awkward, in order to support oldschool platforms they still wrongly handle the pkgconfig file.

cicku's libstatgrab-0.91-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=685013

libstatgrab-0.91-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15870

libstatgrab-0.91-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libstatgrab'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15870

lxqt-panel has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
	lxqt-panel-0.9.0-7.fc23.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit)
On i386:
	lxqt-panel-0.9.0-7.fc23.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6
On armhfp:
	lxqt-panel-0.9.0-7.fc23.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.6
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #16)
> lxqt-panel has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> 	lxqt-panel-0.9.0-7.fc23.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit)
> On i386:
> 	lxqt-panel-0.9.0-7.fc23.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6
> On armhfp:
> 	lxqt-panel-0.9.0-7.fc23.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.6
> Please resolve this as soon as possible.

Not my fault, they need to rebuild the packages. lxqt panel supports libstatgrab 0.90+.

Anyways, you can not push to stable currently cause of Beta Freeze.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #18)
> Anyways, you can not push to stable currently cause of Beta Freeze.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

Did you mean f23? Well it's already been cancelled according to negative karma threshold.

I planned to push the update to f23 since some people need that, but fine with current state because it doesn't really matter too much.

It is YOUR responsibility to:
* announce soname bumps in your packages AND
* ensure dependent packages get rebuilt in a timely manner.

For stable releases (currently F21 and F22) and branched prereleases (currently F23), soname bumps:
* are discouraged by the packaging guidelines and should only be done if there is a good reason, which so far you failed to provide (please clarify "some people need that"),
* MUST be pushed as grouped updates containing both the library and rebuilds of ALL dependent packages (using a buildroot override) in one and the same update group.
You MUST NEVER push a soname bump of a library as a standalone update in Bodhi (unless nothing in Fedora depends on it, of course).