Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 114498 - The window lists's OMF file is not proper UTF-8
Summary: The window lists's OMF file is not proper UTF-8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: gnome-panel
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mark McLoughlin
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 114547 114667 114898 115746 116143 116691 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-01-28 19:32 UTC by Gary Peck
Modified: 2005-10-31 22:00 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-02-29 07:22:23 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Gary Peck 2004-01-28 19:32:20 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5)
Gecko/20040105 Firebird/0.7

Description of problem:
The /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf is not properly
encoded. This causes rpm updates to emit the following warning:

/usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf:12: parser error : Input
is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding !
      Manual de la miniaplicaic�n Lista de ventanas V2.6
                               ^
/usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf:12: error: Bytes: 0xF3
0x6E 0x20 0x4C
      Manual de la miniaplicaic�n Lista de ventanas V2.6
                               ^
OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML:
/usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf
Unable to complete update.  Could not register
/usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-panel-2.5.3.1-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install gnome-panel
2. run scrollkeeper-update
3.
    

Actual Results:  The same output as in the description.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Gary Peck 2004-02-06 04:56:39 UTC 
Looks like it's fixed upstream according to
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-February/msg00259.html.
Comment 2 Mike McLean 2004-02-12 18:29:05 UTC 
*** Bug 114547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Mike McLean 2004-02-12 18:30:03 UTC 
*** Bug 114898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-18 17:34:23 UTC 
*** Bug 116143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-18 17:34:53 UTC 
*** Bug 115746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Leonard den Ottolander 2004-02-23 10:12:33 UTC 
According to bug 116475 this issue is still open in gnome-panel-2.5.3,
in contrast to what comment 1 suggests.
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-23 23:16:06 UTC 
*** Bug 116475 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Mike McLean 2004-02-23 23:18:34 UTC 
It's very nice that this bug is fixed upstream, but can we please
actually get that fix in rawhide?
Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-23 23:50:36 UTC 
*** Bug 116631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Leonard den Ottolander 2004-02-24 10:10:23 UTC 
Does the update to gnome-panel-2.4.2-1 solve this issue? If so it
needs to be propagated to 2.5.3 (upstream) (see bug 116475 for FC2 test1).
Comment 11 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-24 20:26:17 UTC 
*** Bug 116691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-27 17:57:45 UTC 
*** Bug 114667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-27 22:53:43 UTC 
Should be fixed in Raw Hide now
Comment 14 Alexandre Oliva 2004-02-28 18:45:07 UTC 
Err...  You call that a fix?  It was a very ugly work around!  What's
wrong with the correct fix proposed in bug 116691?  Perhaps the fact
that `aplicación', which I wrote in the bugzilla bug entry form,
didn't make it to the actual bug report correctly?
Comment 15 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-29 07:22:23 UTC 
This was fixed upstream. All I did was pull the latest upstream
tarball. If you think the upstream fix was wrong please reopen:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132715
Comment 16 Alexandre Oliva 2004-02-29 21:36:32 UTC 
Oh, my, sorry about my tone above.  It was meant to be read in a
joking tone, but only now I realize I missed :-)s all over.  If you
got me all wrong, please accept my deepest apologies.  I added a note
to the upstream bug, but I don't have permission to reopen it.  I hope
it doesn't get lost.
Comment 17 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-29 21:42:51 UTC 
Heh - don't worry, I've learned well enough at this stage not to take
stuff personally :-)
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.