Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1152245 - Review Request: jsr292-mock - Mock versions of java.lang.invoke
Summary: Review Request: jsr292-mock - Mock versions of java.lang.invoke
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1152249
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-10-13 17:21 UTC by Mo Morsi
Modified: 2020-11-13 00:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mo Morsi 2014-10-13 17:21:54 UTC 
Spec URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/jsr292-mock.spec
SRPM URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/jsr292-mock-1.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: 
A mock of java.lang.invoke for JRuby

Fedora Account System Username: mmorsi
Comment 1 Michal Srb 2014-10-15 06:30:58 UTC 
Similarly as in unsafe-mock review. This package doesn't make much sense in Fedora, as we have Java 8 (f21+). It's only a build-time dependency of JRuby and it can be safely omitted when building in Fedora. So I would recommend simply removing this dependency from JRuby's pom.xml file. But if you really want to have this package in Fedora, I can continue with the review. Unlike unsafe-mock, this package doesn't bundle anything.
Comment 2 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:50:50 UTC 
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.
Comment 3 Package Review 2020-11-13 00:46:21 UTC 
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.