Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 118651 - bad wnn home dir, /etc/services munging
Summary: bad wnn home dir, /etc/services munging
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: FreeWnn
Version: 2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jens Petersen
QA Contact: Bill Huang
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC2Blocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-03-18 16:41 UTC by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-17 02:43 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 1:1.10pl020-2
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-08-06 02:16:37 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Bill Nottingham 2004-03-18 16:41:51 UTC 
1) you shouldn't touch /etc/services... the services file is in setup
and can be modified there if needed.
2) wnn's home dir shouldn't be in /home
3) wnn is created in both FreeWnn-common and FreeWnn %post - pick one. :)
Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2004-03-19 03:31:33 UTC 
Thanks, fixing in next build.
Comment 2 Warren Togami 2004-04-11 02:37:32 UTC 
Has this been fixed?
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2004-04-12 04:41:47 UTC 
Should be in 1:1.10pl020-1.
Comment 4 Seth Vidal 2004-05-07 16:06:29 UTC 
Looking in %preinstall of 1.11-42.1 I'm seeing
preinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
# Do only for the first install
if [ "$1" = 1 ] ; then
  # Add the wnn4 lines to /etc/services
  if (grep '22273/tcp' /etc/services >/dev/null); then
    true
  else
    cat <<'_EOD2_' >>/etc/services
# start of wnn4 services
wnn4              22273/tcp
# end of wnn4 services
_EOD2_
  fi
fi
 

seems like services is still being modified.
and the user account is being created in both FreeWnn and FreeWnn-common
Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2004-05-07 16:22:55 UTC 
Unfortunately FreeWnn-1.10pl020 segfaults on hammer at least
and possibly another arch too iirc.
Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2004-05-10 06:57:15 UTC 
In comment 5, I meant the 1.10pl020 build segfaults on x86_64.
Comment 7 Jens Petersen 2004-07-05 11:33:33 UTC 
Sopwith built it recently.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.