issue: version in changelog incoherent with actual version

Please consider to use github as source0 and enable tests.


Overall APPROVED, 
please update changelog version before pushing to scm




Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Apache (v2.0)". Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/piotr/rpmbuild/1187961-nodejs-typescript/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: nodejs-typescript-1.4.1-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          nodejs-typescript-1.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm
nodejs-typescript.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-1 ['1.4.1-1.fc23', '1.4.1-1']
nodejs-typescript.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-typescript.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/nodejs-typescript/ThirdPartyNoticeText.txt
nodejs-typescript.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/nodejs-typescript/CopyrightNotice.txt
nodejs-typescript.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/nodejs-typescript/README.md
nodejs-typescript.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/nodejs-typescript/LICENSE.txt
nodejs-typescript.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tsc
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Requires
--------
nodejs-typescript (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/env
    nodejs(engine)



Provides
--------
nodejs-typescript:
    nodejs-typescript
    npm(typescript)



Source checksums
----------------
http://registry.npmjs.org/typescript/-/typescript-1.4.1.tgz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7dfe876f851a9d5e10d959ddee2ba60bc417d61a92a3b04a64185023e826ede3
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7dfe876f851a9d5e10d959ddee2ba60bc417d61a92a3b04a64185023e826ede3


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1187961
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

(In reply to Piotr Popieluch from comment #1)
> issue: version in changelog incoherent with actual version
> 
> Please consider to use github as source0 and enable tests.

I'll do both of these before pushing. Thanks a lot for the review!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: nodejs-typescript
Short Description: A language for application scale JavaScript development
Owners: galileo
Branches: f22, f21

Git done (by process-git-requests).

Built for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9093927