My main issue is compilation of protobuf-c. I got a mail:

protobuf-c has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
        protobuf-c-1.0.1-2.fc22.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.8()(64bit)

Proposed as a Blocker for 22-final by Fedora user nmav using the blocker tracking app because:

 I received the following mail:
protobuf-c has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
        protobuf-c-1.0.1-2.fc22.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.8()(64bit)

Some research in brew shows that the latest protobuf compilation failed and no other build was submitted since then:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/protobuf/builds

The protocol buffers library is used by quite few packages. Not shipping it in F22 is a serious regression.

$ repoquery --whatrequires protobuf|grep x86_64|wc -l
45
$ repoquery --whatrequires protobuf-c|grep x86_64|wc -l
13

I'm gonna assign this to 'distribution', because the f21 package should be in the 22 tree - I can't see any reason for it not to be. The package isn't orphaned for F22, nor does anything seem to obsolete it, so I can't see a reason why it shouldn't have the previous successful build.

The mail that I have received may have been incorrect. I can scratch build in f22 so the package is certainly there. I'm closing this as it looks like a false alarm.

Um. I thought the issue wasn't that the package isn't in the *scm*, it's that the package isn't in the *repositories*. I would expect https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/22/x86_64/os/Packages/p/ to contain whatever was the last successful build on the Rawhide branch before F22 branched from it, but it does not seem to.

I see both protobuf-2.5.0-11.fc22.x86_64.rpm and protobuf-devel-2.5.0-11.fc22.x86_64.rpm in the URL you quote.

definitely weren't there the two times I checked previously...