Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1278287 - "shutdown --poweroff +1" acts immediately with setenforce 1
Summary: "shutdown --poweroff +1" acts immediately with setenforce 1
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1279928
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: systemd
Version: 23
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: systemd-maint
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-11-05 07:45 UTC by Marius Vollmer
Modified: 2015-12-02 12:16 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-02 09:16:45 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Marius Vollmer 2015-11-05 07:45:29 UTC
Description of problem:

When SELinux is on, delayed shutdowns don't work because the "shutdown" command can't talk to systemd-logind over D-Bus.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

systemd-222-7

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. virt-builder fedora-23
2. Run the image and log in
3. setenforce 1
3. shutdown --poweroff +1

Actual results:

Machine powers off immediately.

Expected results:

Machine powers off in one minute.

Additional info:

This can be found in the journal:

Failed to call ScheduleShutdown in logind, proceeding with immediate shutdown: Access denied

marras 05 09:12:47 f3 systemd-logind[391]: Failed to save information about scheduled shutdowns: Permission denied
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 audit[391]: AVC avc:  denied  { create } for  pid=391 comm="systemd-logind" name=".#scheduledy93pDt" scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:init_var_run_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 audit[391]: SYSCALL arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=no exit=-13 a0=55c6c9b18370 a1=800c2 a2=180 a3=0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=391 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="systemd-logind" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind" subj=system_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0 key=(null)
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 audit: PROCTITLE proctitle="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind"
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 cockpit-bridge[955]: Failed to call ScheduleShutdown in logind, proceeding with immediate shutdown: Access denied
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 systemd-logind[391]: Creating /run/nologin, blocking further logins...
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 audit[391]: AVC avc:  denied  { create } for  pid=391 comm="systemd-logind" name=".#nologingerasc" scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 systemd-logind[391]: Failed to create /run/nologin: Permission denied
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 audit[391]: SYSCALL arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=no exit=-13 a0=55c6c9b196f0 a1=800c2 a2=180 a3=0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=391 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="systemd-logind" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind" subj=system_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0 key=(null)
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 audit: PROCTITLE proctitle="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind"
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 systemd-logind[391]: Failed to abandon session scope: Transport endpoint is not connected
marras 05 09:12:47 f3 audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=systemd-logind comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success'

Calling "setenforce 0" before "shutdown --poweroff +1" makes everything work as expected.

Comment 1 Jan Synacek 2015-12-02 09:16:45 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1279928 ***

Comment 2 Marius Vollmer 2015-12-02 10:15:36 UTC
Would bug 1255238 be a better duplicate?

Comment 3 Jan Synacek 2015-12-02 12:16:01 UTC
Not really, there are several bugs about basically the same issue. I tried to link them together. The original issue is resolved now.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.