Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 1282243 - pysendfile: Suggest to update the upstream link and version for Python 3 supports
Summary: pysendfile: Suggest to update the upstream link and version for Python 3 supp...
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pysendfile
Version: 24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomas Orsava
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2015-11-15 18:09 UTC by Michael Lee
Modified: 2017-08-07 12:41 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: pysendfile-2.0.1-1.fc25
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2016-07-08 15:56:48 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Python 3 patch for specfile (deleted)
2016-06-08 12:49 UTC, Dominika Krejčí
no flags Details | Diff

Description Michael Lee 2015-11-15 18:09:24 UTC
Description of problem:

Upstream link changed to from Google Code to github.

New version 2.0.1 suggested to support Python 3.

Comment 1 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 13:58:42 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:

Comment 2 Petr Viktorin (pviktori) 2016-04-19 14:39:58 UTC
Russell, do you need any help with the update, or with supporting Python 3?

Comment 3 Dominika Krejčí 2016-06-08 12:49:54 UTC
Created attachment 1166005 [details]
Python 3 patch for specfile

Hi Russell,
here is the change needed to add Python 3 support. Could you please review it and do the update?

Koji scratch build:

Also tested in Mock (fedora-23-x86_64, fedora-24-x86_64, fedora-rawhide-i386, fedora-rawhide-x86_64).

Comment 4 Tomas Orsava 2016-06-09 09:41:27 UTC
The patch looks good, Dominika, thank you!

Comment 5 Tomas Orsava 2016-06-09 09:42:01 UTC
Hi Russell,
as this is a bit of a time sensitive issue, we would really appreciate if you could take a look at the patch as soon as possible.
If you are time constrained right now, I hope you won't mind if we do the review and push the changes ourselves in case you are unable.

Thank you!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.