Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 1293043 (python-epac) - Review Request: python-epac - Machine learning workflow builder
Summary: Review Request: python-epac - Machine learning workflow builder
Alias: python-epac
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Igor Raits
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW fedora-neuro
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2015-12-19 15:31 UTC by Ilya Gradina
Modified: 2020-07-10 09:58 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2020-07-10 09:58:31 UTC
Type: ---
ignatenko: fedora-review?

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ilya Gradina 2015-12-19 15:31:54 UTC
Spec URL:
Description: Embarrassingly Parallel Array Computing: EPAC is a machine learning workflow builder. 
Fedora Account System Username: ilgrad

Comment 1 Igor Gnatenko 2015-12-19 16:11:42 UTC
Missing requires, missing buildrequires, no python3 package. Binary should point to py3 version.

Comment 2 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2015-12-20 00:41:28 UTC
fedora-review- is for packages which can't be fixed, while the review is in progress it's customary not to set anything, or to set fedora-review?.

Do not repeat the package name in the summary (it should be short to display properly in various listings). Maybe
Summary:  Machine learning workflow builder

The license tag for bsd 3-clause is just "BSD". See

You should create a python2 subpackage, and add support for python3 if possible.
See for the new python packaging.

Comment 3 Igor Gnatenko 2016-08-08 05:56:55 UTC

Comment 4 Igor Gnatenko 2017-06-21 15:04:53 UTC
ping once more?

Comment 5 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2018-08-05 09:48:53 UTC
Hi Ilya,

Would you like to continue the review so that the package can be included in NeuroFedora?


Comment 6 Ilya Gradina 2018-08-07 21:30:21 UTC
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #5)
> Hi Ilya,
> Would you like to continue the review so that the package can be included in
> NeuroFedora?
> Cheers!
> Ankur

Hi Ankur,
yes, I  will continue the review.

Comment 7 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:54:13 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 8 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2020-07-10 09:58:31 UTC
Closing this now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.