Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 1305872 - Port to python3
Summary: Port to python3
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: binclock
Version: 24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miro Hrončok
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2016-02-09 12:54 UTC by Pavel Prochazka
Modified: 2019-11-19 15:09 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: binclock-0.4.0-1.fc25
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2016-08-27 10:26:57 UTC
Type: Bug
prochazka: needinfo-

Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch (deleted)
2016-02-09 12:54 UTC, Pavel Prochazka
no flags Details
New specfile (deleted)
2016-08-10 09:31 UTC, Lumír Balhar
no flags Details

Description Pavel Prochazka 2016-02-09 12:54:14 UTC
Created attachment 1122402 [details]

Please use git am with my patch.

Comment 1 Tomas Orsava 2016-02-12 12:43:46 UTC
Hi Pavel, I was wondering, have you tried sending your patch upstream? If so, have you gotten any response?

Comment 2 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 14:27:21 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:

Comment 3 Lumír Balhar 2016-07-27 11:27:26 UTC
I've sent inner patch 'binclock-python3.patch' to upstream developer. If we will have no response, we can add this patch to package and apply changes to specfile.

Comment 4 Lumír Balhar 2016-08-01 07:06:01 UTC
I found only one developer's email address brian but this address doesn't work.

IMHO this patch is too big to be only in fedora package repository. Could you consider to maintain your own fork of this software? I think it would be better because next time when somebody will need to make some change he/she will have to change this big patch and this will be hard.

What do you think about it? If you have not enough time to do it or need some help do not hesitate to contact us.

Comment 5 Lumír Balhar 2016-08-10 07:27:47 UTC

I've created new GitHub repo with link to original SourceForge project page [0]. I've also requested rights for this package in PkgDB to be a comantainer.

If maintainer gives mi access to PkgDB repository then I can move this forward.


Have a nice day

Comment 6 Lumír Balhar 2016-08-10 09:31:05 UTC
Created attachment 1189535 [details]
New specfile

And here is new modernized specfile with new upstream version and source URL.

Koji scratch build:

If maintainer has nothing against, we can push this changes.

Comment 7 Lumír Balhar 2016-08-17 07:45:46 UTC
One more week without a reply. I think we can push it.

Comment 8 Miro Hrončok 2016-08-17 08:14:11 UTC

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2016-08-17 08:22:11 UTC
binclock-0.4.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2016-08-17 19:53:41 UTC
binclock-0.4.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2016-08-27 10:26:53 UTC
binclock-0.4.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.