Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 1315805 - Review Request: python-requests-unixsocket - Use requests to talk HTTP via a UNIX domain socket
Summary: Review Request: python-requests-unixsocket - Use requests to talk HTTP via a ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1695172
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Chandan Kumar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: RDO-MITAKA, RDO-MITAKA-REVIEWS 1315809 1411746
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2016-03-08 16:15 UTC by Haïkel Guémar
Modified: 2023-09-14 03:19 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2019-04-02 15:51:42 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Haïkel Guémar 2016-03-08 16:15:15 UTC
Spec URL:
Description: Use requests to talk HTTP via a UNIX domain socket
Fedora Account System Username: hguemar

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2016-11-06 21:25:05 UTC

Do you plan on reviewing this anytime soon?

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2016-11-06 21:34:02 UTC
Here's a few comments about the package:

* Since this module does not output any scripts, the comment in the %install section is meaningless.

* We now prefer that scripts be Python 3 powered rather than Python 2 powered, so %py3_install should be after %py2_install, not before. (Not that this matters in the context of this package.)

* Python 3 subpackage doesn't have LICENSE under %license. That should be fixed.

Comment 3 Dan Radez 2019-04-02 14:59:57 UTC
Not sure what the right way to revive this review request is.
I've uploaded new files addressing the comments.

I'll ping Haïkel too.

Comment 4 Haïkel Guémar 2019-04-02 15:45:32 UTC
No worries, I'm fine with Dan taking over this review :)

Comment 5 Dan Radez 2019-04-02 15:51:42 UTC
Closing this duplicate of a new bug to continue the review.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1695172 ***

Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 03:19:07 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.