Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1361471 - Review Request: lit - LLVM lit test runner
Summary: Review Request: lit - LLVM lit test runner
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1425658
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-07-29 06:45 UTC by jeremy.fergason
Modified: 2019-04-04 07:32 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-04-04 07:32:56 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description jeremy.fergason 2016-07-29 06:45:09 UTC 
Spec URL: http://builtwithswift.com/python-lit.spec
SRPM URL: http://builtwithswift.com/python-lit-0.5.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: lit is a portable tool for executing LLVM and Clang style test suites, summarizing their results, and providing indication of failures. lit is designed to be a lightweight testing tool with as simple a user interface as possible.
Fedora Account System Username: jdfergason
Comment 1 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-11-12 19:33:26 UTC 
llvm package already provides /bin/lit:
$ rpm -ql llvm|grep lit
/usr/bin/llvm-split
/usr/share/man/man1/lit.1.gz

So there'd be a conflict. But it does not provide the python packages, afaics. Nevertheless, it'd probably be better to make those python parts a subpackage of the llvm package. I'd suggest that you open an RFE bug for that. It'd probably help if you provide a patch for the llvm spec file to implement that.
Comment 2 Robin Lee 2019-04-04 07:32:56 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1425658 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.