Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 13819 - can't upgrade package with symlink in place of directory
Summary: can't upgrade package with symlink in place of directory
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 3979
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: rpm
Version: 6.2
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeff Johnson
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 23265 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2000-07-12 19:39 UTC by Philip Spencer
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-01-09 15:42:12 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Philip Spencer 2000-07-12 19:39:27 UTC 
RPM (both versions 3.0.3 from Redhat 6.1 distribution and 3.0.4 from Redhat
6.2 distribution) will fail to upgrade a package if the new version has a
symlink where the old version had a directory.

Example:

Package foo version 1 has a directory /foo
Package foo version 2 puts its stuff in /bar, and has a symlink /foo ->
/bar for compatibility.

If foo-1.whatever.rpm is installed, "rpm -U foo-2.whatever.rpm" will fail.
With rpm 3.0.4 the error message is "unpacking of archive failed on file
/foo: cpio: unlink failed - Bad file descriptor". Version 3.0.3 gives a
slightly better message, "unpacking of archive failed on file /foo: cpio:
unlink failed - Is a directory".

rpm -e foo followed by rpm -U foo works correctly, but foo cannot be
upgraded from version 1 to version 2 by rpm unless you erase it completely
first.
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2000-07-12 19:47:42 UTC 
No version of rpm has ever supported the ability to replace a directory with a
symlink. This
problem is starting to be addressed in rpm-4.0, but  ...

I'd suggest you consider some other way to package, because it's gonna be a
while before
rpm can/will support the ability to replace a directory with a symlink.
Comment 2 Jeff Johnson 2001-01-09 15:41:14 UTC 
*** Bug 23265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Jeff Johnson 2001-01-09 16:26:27 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3979 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.