Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1409400 - Review Request: parzip - High performance parallel pkzip implementation
Summary: Review Request: parzip - High performance parallel pkzip implementation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1409661
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-01-01 18:20 UTC by Igor Gnatenko
Modified: 2017-08-02 21:20 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-02 21:20:54 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Igor Gnatenko 2017-01-01 18:20:22 UTC
Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/parzip.spec
SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/parzip-1.1.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description: A command line utility to pack and unpack zip archives using multiple threads.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2017-01-02 02:22:06 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2017-01-02 02:24:14 UTC
Review notes:

- Package is named correctly
- Follows packaging guidelines for applications
- Consistently uses macros
- License is marked appropriately and license file is denoted correctly

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2017-01-02 21:14:10 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/parzip

Comment 4 Igor Gnatenko 2017-01-02 21:48:58 UTC
Built for rawhide, but f24/f25 fails.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.