Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1451161 - REQUEST tor 3.x available and is stable version
Summary: REQUEST tor 3.x available and is stable version
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1284469
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: tor
Version: 25
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-05-16 01:32 UTC by Paul DeStefano
Modified: 2020-11-05 09:32 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-19 20:17:57 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Paul DeStefano 2017-05-16 01:32:12 UTC 
Description of problem:

Please update tor package to current stable branch, 3.x
Comment 1 Paul DeStefano 2017-05-31 18:43:33 UTC 
My node probability has dropped to nill.  I'm concerned it is because the version of tor is old.  Do you think that is possible?
Comment 2 Marcel Haerry 2017-06-29 16:45:30 UTC 
There is no Tor 3.x release, but I assume you mean Tor 0.3.x?

Well the current version is only one release (0.2.9.10 - 0.2.9.11) behind the last LTS release:

"If you need a release with long-term support, 0.2.9 is
what we recommend: we plan to support it until at least 1 Jan 2020."

https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-0308-released-fix-hidden-services-also-are-02429-02514-02612-0278-02814-and-02911

So your probability should not really be affected by that.

Regarding 0.3.0.8 see #1284469

I would suggest to close this issue in favor of #1284469
Comment 3 Paul DeStefano 2017-07-05 07:04:06 UTC 
Yes, that sounds great.  Thank you for explaining.  I confess I loose track of the Tor release scheme often.  LTS sounds fine.  Although, I hope we don't need to wait for 2020 for a new version.

Sorry for the late reply, BTW.  I would have closed this bug, but wasn't sure what type of close you intended.
Comment 4 Marcel Haerry 2017-07-26 08:42:34 UTC 
I guess only Jamie can close the bug
Comment 5 iliana etaoin 2017-08-19 20:17:57 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1284469 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.