Just a few preliminary remarks.

 - Not needed:
    - Group:
    - BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-v%{version}-root
    - %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
    - %clean
      %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
    - %defattr(-,root,root,-)

 - /usr/share/mew/ → %{_datadir}/mew/

 - Split the description lines to stay below 80 characters per line

 - No need to use macros for %{__install} and %{__cp}

 - Don't put this in the summary: Package maintained by Rene Jr Purcell.

 - Summary shouldn't end with a dot

 - The correct shorthand for MIT is MIT, not "MIT License". See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses for a list of valid licenses.

 - Don't depend on Firefox, let the user choose whatever browser they want

 - Latest version is v3.21.02

Thank you for your suggestions, I think I've fixed most/all of your point.

Here's the Spec and srpm updated.

Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/arsenick/MyLiveCrypto/fedora-27-x86_64/00730407-etherwallet/mew.spec

SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/arsenick/MyLiveCrypto/fedora-27-x86_64/00730407-etherwallet/etherwallet-3.21.02-1.fc27.src.rpm

I've updated the spec file according to your comment on my other package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558976#c1

So the LICENSE.md file has been added and the changelog section of the spec file has been populated. There was a new release of the upstream today, it's now in sync with it.

Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/arsenick/MyLiveCrypto/fedora-27-x86_64/00731471-etherwallet/mew.spec

SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/arsenick/MyLiveCrypto/fedora-27-x86_64/00731471-etherwallet/etherwallet-3.21.03-1.fc27.src.rpm

I'm sorry I have forgotten this review.

The problem I have with this is that you're distributing the end result instead of building from the source with gulp.

You might need to package some gulp dependencies yourself to get the whole pipeline (may take some work).

Hi Robert, I should have updated those request. I've talked with few helping folks on freenode after I posted those review request and they told me exactly the same thing as your last comment. I then realised there a load of dependency in there.. And I just can't build packages for all of those, if I remember it was like 200 nodejs dependency..

So I don't know if things has changed since but if I really need to build packages for every dependency than I will not have the time required to do this unfortunately..

Repost as is and I'll review the thingie.
Don't forget to add a Provides: bundled(jquery) = 1.12.3

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.