+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1614504 +++

Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rga/classification-banner/epel-7-x86_64/00786409-classification-banner/classification-banner.spec
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rga/classification-banner/epel-7-x86_64/00786409-classification-banner/classification-banner-1.6.7-1.el7.src.rpm

Koji Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28950024
Copr Builds: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rga/classification-banner/monitor/

Description: 
Classification Banner is a python script that will display the
classification level banner of a session with a variety of
configuration options on the primary screen.  This script can
help government and possibly private customers display a 
notification that sensitive material is being displayed - for 
example PII Material being processed in a graphical
session. The script has been tested on a variety of graphical
environments such as GNOME2, GNOME3, KDE, twm, icewm, and Cinnamon.

Fedora Account System Username: rga

--- Additional comment from  on 2018-08-09 14:34:08 EDT ---

This is for EPEL 7.

--- Additional comment from Artur Iwicki on 2018-08-10 15:04:17 EDT ---

>URL:            https://github.com/SecurityCentral/classification-banner
>Source0:        https://github.com/SecurityCentral/classification-banner/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
You can shorten this by using %{URL} as part of Source0.

>%{__install} -d -m755 ...
>%{__install} -m644 ...
Macro forms of system executables should not be used.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros

--- Additional comment from  on 2018-08-10 15:49:44 EDT ---

(In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #2)
> >URL:            https://github.com/SecurityCentral/classification-banner
> >Source0:        https://github.com/SecurityCentral/classification-banner/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> You can shorten this by using %{URL} as part of Source0.

Thanks! I didn't even think of that. Fixed.

> 
> >%{__install} -d -m755 ...
> >%{__install} -m644 ...
> Macro forms of system executables should not be used.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros

Thanks! I must have missed that in reading through the Guidelines. Fixed.

Updated spec, SRPM, and ran builds.

Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rga/classification-banner/epel-7-x86_64/00786861-classification-banner/classification-banner.spec
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rga/classification-banner/epel-7-x86_64/00786861-classification-banner/classification-banner-1.6.7-1.el7.src.rpm

Koji Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28973094
Copr Builds: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rga/classification-banner/build/786861/

--- Additional comment from Robert-André Mauchin on 2018-08-12 15:37:13 EDT ---

 - Use:

Source0:        %{URL}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

   not

Source0:        https://%{URL}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz


 - Not needed, et is the default: 

%defattr(-,root,root)

 - Use "install -p" to keep the timestamp

install -pm644 contrib/banner.conf %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/banner.conf
install -pm644 share/%{name}-screenshot.png %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}-screenshot.png
install -pm644 contrib/%{name}.desktop %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart/%{name}.desktop

 - Use:

BuildRequires:  python2-setuptools
BuildRequires:  python2-devel


 - Don't use a glob here, be more specific. Also use python2_sitelib:

%{python2_sitelib}/classification_banner
%{python2_sitelib}/classification_banner-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info

 - This shouldn't be necessary for a noarch package:

%global debug_package   %{nil}

 - The Release info is missing in your %changelog entry:

* Thu Aug 9 2018 Gabe <redhatrises> - 1.6.7-1


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
  Note: Package contains %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
  See: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782w


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /media/home/bob/packaging/review
     /classification-banner/review-classification-banner/licensecheck.txt
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /etc/classification-banner
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package
     contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
     Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in classification-banner
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: classification-banner-1.6.7-1.el7.noarch.rpm
          classification-banner-1.6.7-1.el7.src.rpm
classification-banner.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US twm -> tam, two, tom
classification-banner.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icewm -> icemen
classification-banner.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.6.7 ['1.6.7-1.el7', '1.6.7-1']
classification-banner.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary classification-banner
classification-banner.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US twm -> tam, two, tom
classification-banner.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icewm -> icemen
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

--- Additional comment from  on 2018-08-13 13:48:47 EDT ---

Updated SPEC URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rga/classification-banner/epel-7-x86_64/00787563-classification-banner/classification-banner.spec
Updated SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rga/classification-banner/epel-7-x86_64/00787563-classification-banner/classification-banner-1.6.7-1.el7.src.rpm

--- Additional comment from Robert-André Mauchin on 2018-08-13 14:01:43 EDT ---

Should be ok, package approved.