Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1649124 - Offline updates hang on 97%
Summary: Offline updates hang on 97%
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1642796
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: PackageKit
Version: 29
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Richard Hughes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-11-12 23:53 UTC by AsciiWolf
Modified: 2018-11-13 07:06 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-13 07:06:32 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Hang during offline updates (821.22 KB, image/jpeg)
2018-11-12 23:53 UTC, AsciiWolf 		no flags Details
View All

Description AsciiWolf 2018-11-12 23:53:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1505021 [details]
Hang during offline updates

Description of problem:
Sometimes, when updating the system using PackageKit offline updates, the update process hangs on 97%. There is a "A start job is running for Update the operating system whilst offline" systemd message being shown, but it never finish. It can be resolved only by hard-rebooting the system.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
PackageKit-1.1.11-1.fc29.x86_64

How reproducible:
Sporadic.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Wait for system update.
2. Download the update using GNOME Software.
3. Reboot the computer to install the update.

Actual results:
Offline updates hang on 97%.

Expected results:
Offline updates complete successfully.

Additional info:
See the attached photo. Unfortunately, I was not able to find any relevant logs.
Comment 1 Kalev Lember 2018-11-13 07:06:32 UTC 
That was a bug in libdnf and should be already fixed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1642796 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.