Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 166459 - Review Request: bigloo - compiler for the Scheme programming language
Summary: Review Request: bigloo - compiler for the Scheme programming language
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Aurelien Bompard
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/4/i38...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-08-21 23:07 UTC by Gérard Milmeister
Modified: 2010-07-08 01:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-28 18:17:11 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
kevin: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Gérard Milmeister 2005-08-21 23:07:22 UTC 
Spec Name or Url: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/bigloo.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/4/i386/SRPMS.gemi/bigloo-2.6f-2.src.rpm
Description:
Bigloo is a compiler and interpreter for an extended version of the
Scheme programming language. Bigloo allows a full connection between
Scheme and C programs. It delivers fast and small executables.
Comment 1 Aurelien Bompard 2005-09-26 20:58:34 UTC 
- When building in mock I get this after ./configure :
    ERROR: Illegal option "--arch=i386"
  It looks like the arch must be > i586
- You should also use smp_mflags, or put a comment explaining that this package
does not build with it (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake)
Comment 2 Gérard Milmeister 2005-09-27 21:39:10 UTC 
SRPM: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/4/i386/SRPMS.gemi/bigloo-2.6f-3.src.rpm

- removed the arch configuration
- smp_mflags builds the break, included a comment about this
Comment 3 Aurelien Bompard 2005-09-28 10:59:22 UTC 
* RPM name is OK
* Source bigloo2.6f.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* This is the latest version
* Builds fine in mock
* rpmlints look OK
* File lists look OK
* Tested on some included examples, seems to work.
Comment 4 Michael Schwendt 2005-10-13 21:09:46 UTC 
* Bugzilla component is missing.

* Broken package dependencies on ppc:

$ rpm -qpR bigloo-libs-2.6f-1.fc4.ppc.rpm  | grep build
/builddir/build/BUILD/bigloo2.6f/lib/2.6f/libbigloo_s-2.6f.so  

Same for bigloo-2.6f-1.fc4.ppc.rpm
Comment 5 Gérard Milmeister 2005-10-13 21:41:23 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> * Bugzilla component is missing.
Ok, updated owners.list

> * Broken package dependencies on ppc:
> 
> $ rpm -qpR bigloo-libs-2.6f-1.fc4.ppc.rpm  | grep build
> /builddir/build/BUILD/bigloo2.6f/lib/2.6f/libbigloo_s-2.6f.so  
> 
> Same for bigloo-2.6f-1.fc4.ppc.rpm

Do you know what's wrong there, bigloo-libs-2.6f-3 doesn't have
this problem.
Comment 6 Michael Schwendt 2005-10-14 21:38:44 UTC 
bigloo-libs-2.6f-3 is not in CVS and not in the repository either.

bigloo-libs-2.6f-1.fc4 is.  devel ppc is affected, too.  In the ppc
build log it might be possible to see what it does with your
LD_LIBRARY_PATH which is modified to include a build directory.

$ grep builddir *
Binary file libbigloobdl_s-2.6f.so matches
Binary file libbigloobdl_u-2.6f.so matches
Binary file libbigloofth_s-2.6f.so matches
Binary file libbigloofth_u-2.6f.so matches

$ readelf -d libbigloobdl_s-2.6f.so | grep build
 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library:
[/builddir/build/BUILD/bigloo2.6f/lib/2.6f/libbigloo_s-2.6f.so]
Comment 7 Gérard Milmeister 2005-10-14 22:41:08 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> bigloo-libs-2.6f-3 is not in CVS and not in the repository either.
My mistake. I installed anew from extras.
But still the i386 bigloo-2.6f-1.fc4 doesn't have this problem.
I would like to know what it is that is different in the ppc build.
Building and linking should be identical, shouldn't it?

> bigloo-libs-2.6f-1.fc4 is.  devel ppc is affected, too.  In the ppc
> build log it might be possible to see what it does with your
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH which is modified to include a build directory.
> 
> $ grep builddir *
> Binary file libbigloobdl_s-2.6f.so matches
> Binary file libbigloobdl_u-2.6f.so matches
> Binary file libbigloofth_s-2.6f.so matches
> Binary file libbigloofth_u-2.6f.so matches
> 
> $ readelf -d libbigloobdl_s-2.6f.so | grep build
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library:
> [/builddir/build/BUILD/bigloo2.6f/lib/2.6f/libbigloo_s-2.6f.so]

There are always some problems with archs other than i386, mostly ppc,
sometimes x86_64. I have no means to test on these, maybe there should
be some experts in the fedora project, that can help these problem, or at
least a testing build system, where one can try out some things.
Comment 8 Michael Schwendt 2005-10-15 11:30:42 UTC 
Sorry, cannot assist with testing/analysis on ppc. Above is based on
output created by repoclosure, which I've started to play with a bit.
Comment 9 Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-07-05 19:11:20 UTC 
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: bigloo
New Branches: EL-5 EL-6
Owners: salimma
Comment 10 Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-08 01:07:46 UTC 
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.