Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1686813 - Cannot install podman in rawhide
Summary: Cannot install podman in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: podman
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Lokesh Mandvekar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-03-08 11:46 UTC by Lukas Slebodnik
Modified: 2019-03-12 17:13 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-03-08 13:11:36 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lukas Slebodnik 2019-03-08 11:46:13 UTC 
Description of problem:
It was a long time since last compose in rawhide but we finally got new updates today. And I cannot install podman anymore.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
podman-2:1.2.0-8.dev.git40f7843.fc31

How reproducible:
Deterministic

Steps to Reproduce:
2. podman run -ti --rm registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
# run rest in container
3. dnf install -y podman

Actual results:
sh# podman run -ti --rm registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
Trying to pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide...Getting image source signatures
Copying blob sha256:0d03b935ee6aa42b430089d87f9d9ca89006092bc19e16bceed96e94bc683934
 88.96 MB / 88.96 MB [======================================================] 4s
Copying config sha256:6f0c1f93238184a8739ff595fa0f79785a94a31eb2ac7e13ebc4e4ce11a55cce
 1.27 KB / 1.27 KB [========================================================] 0s
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures

[root@975610458f1b /]# dnf install -d1 -y podman
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Fri 08 Mar 2019 11:39:33 AM UTC.
Error: 
 Problem: package podman-2:1.2.0-8.dev.git40f7843.fc31.x86_64 requires conmon, but none of the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests
  - package conmon-2:1.11.8-1.git71cc465.module_f31+3270+f6ef9413.x86_64 is excluded
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)


Expected results:
//no dependency conflicts
[root@b9058850ce9c /]# dnf install -y podman
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:24 ago on Fri 08 Mar 2019 11:32:36 AM UTC.
Dependencies resolved.
============================================================================================================
 Package                 Architecture  Version                                        Repository        Size
============================================================================================================
Installing:
 podman                        x86_64  2:1.2.0-8.dev.git40f7843.fc31                  rawhide           11 M
Installing dependencies:
 conmon                        x86_64  2:1.11.8-1.git71cc465.module_f31+3270+f6ef9413 rawhide-modular   38 k
 container-selinux             noarch  2:2.87-3.git2c1a2ab.fc31                       rawhide           45 k
 containernetworking-plugins   x86_64  0.7.4-2.fc31                                   rawhide           14 M
 containers-common             x86_64  1:0.1.36-2.dev.git2031e17.fc31                 rawhide           33 k
 fuse3-libs                    x86_64  3.2.3-17.fc30                                  rawhide           82 k
 iptables                      x86_64  1.8.0-5.fc30                                   rawhide          372 k
 jansson                       x86_64  2.12-2.fc30                                    rawhide           40 k
 libmnl                        x86_64  1.0.4-9.fc30                                   rawhide           26 k
 libnet                        x86_64  1.1.6-17.fc30                                  rawhide           61 k
 libnetfilter_conntrack        x86_64  1.0.7-2.fc30                                   rawhide           56 k
 libnfnetlink                  x86_64  1.0.1-15.fc30                                  rawhide           27 k
 libnftnl                      x86_64  1.1.1-6.fc30                                   rawhide           84 k
 libnl3                        x86_64  3.4.0-8.fc30                                   rawhide          286 k
 libselinux-utils              x86_64  2.9-0.rc1.1.fc30.1                             rawhide          101 k
 nftables                      x86_64  1:0.9.0-5.fc30                                 rawhide          217 k
 ostree-libs                   x86_64  2019.1-5.fc30                                  rawhide          363 k
 policycoreutils               x86_64  2.9-0.rc1.1.fc30.1                             rawhide          188 k
 protobuf-c                    x86_64  1.3.1-2.fc30                                   rawhide           33 k
 rpm-plugin-selinux            x86_64  4.14.2.1-4.fc30.1                              rawhide           24 k
 runc                          x86_64  2:1.0.0-80.dev.git923a8f8.fc31                 rawhide          2.4 M
 selinux-policy                noarch  3.14.4-3.fc31                                  rawhide          119 k
 selinux-policy-targeted       noarch  3.14.4-3.fc31                                  rawhide           14 M
Installing weak dependencies:
 criu                          x86_64  3.11-3.fc30                                    rawhide          486 k
 fuse-overlayfs                x86_64  0.3-4.dev.gitea72572.fc31                      rawhide           48 k
 slirp4netns                   x86_64  0.3.0-1.alpha.2.git30883b5.fc31                rawhide           71 k

Transaction Summary
============================================================================================================
Install  26 Packages


Additional info:
Workaround is to manually enable necessary module

dnf module enable -y cri-o:1.11

But if podman depends on some module then it should magically enable the right stream. or there should be some hint which module&stream is required.
Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2019-03-08 12:58:40 UTC 
Lsm5 we need to finally ship conmon as a separate package. 
How quickly can we get this done.
Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2019-03-08 13:11:36 UTC 
Fixed in podman-1.2.0-11.dev.git1b2f867.fc31
Comment 3 Lokesh Mandvekar 2019-03-08 13:17:11 UTC 
Also opened https://github.com/containers/conmon/issues/14 for tracking packaging work. I'll open a review request once it's ready.
Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2019-03-11 17:11:44 UTC 
I am confused as to the so-called 'fix' for this bug.

Note this is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686636 , so I'll close it as such, but explaining my concern here.

The 'resolution' does not seem to map to the actual problem here at all. conmon always *has* been a  package that exists in Fedora: it's a subpackage of cri-o. What happened here is that the non-modular cri-o was retired on the f30 and rawhide branches, apparently in favour of a new cri-o module. However, the cri-o module was not given a default stream, which means that nothing from it is 'visible' on an ordinary Fedora 30 or Rawhide system unless the user manually enables the module.

Effectively, conmon used to be part of Fedora 30 and Rawhide, but suddenly was taken out of it.

However, the claimed "fix" for this bug was simply to remove the dependency on conmon from podman, with some ambiguous comments:

"# #1686813 - conmon hasn't been made independent yet"

"Resolves: #1686813 - conmon bundled inside podman rpm"

Neither of those immediately makes any obvious sense. Sure conmon had been made "independent". And is it *really* "bundled inside podman rpm"?

This bug is a blocker for Fedora 30, but before anyone backports this 'fix' to F30 I want to be sure it is in fact correct. Thanks!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1686636 ***
Comment 5 Lukas Slebodnik 2019-03-12 08:14:53 UTC 
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #4)
> I am confused as to the so-called 'fix' for this bug.
> 
> Note this is a duplicate of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686636 , so I'll close it as
> such, but explaining my concern here.
> 

Adam, it is not the same bug.

Rawhide an fedora 30 does not have the same version of podman
podman-1.0.1-31.dev.git228d1cb.fc30 vs podman >= 1.2.0-12.dev.git9b21f14.fc31

And I can confirm my use-case is fixed and I do not use workaround mentioned in the description.

[root@1dc2a2c85267 /]# rpm -q podman
podman-1.2.0-13.dev.gitd95f97a.fc31.x86_64
[root@1dc2a2c85267 /]# podman pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide
Trying to pull docker://registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide...Getting image source signatures
Copying blob 6266bb6e8bee [==================================] 93.0MiB / 93.0MiB
Copying config c67c9a0df4 [====================================] 1.3KiB / 1.3KiB
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
c67c9a0df43a16e0da02b1412b8a7adf1f21c58a083161a56db648e4827b4f6d
Comment 6 Adam Williamson 2019-03-12 15:26:22 UTC 
Lukas, it *is* the same bug. The package versions don't matter: it's simply the case that podman depends/depended on conmon, but conmon effectively disappeared from the repositories because non-modular cri-o was retired. This is true of both F30 and Rawhide. podman-1.0.1-31.dev.git228d1cb.fc30 requires conmon, and podman-1.2.0-8.dev.git40f7843.fc31 required conmon, and cri-o was retired on both master and f30 branches.

It is certainly "fixed" in Rawhide now in the sense that podman no longer requires conmon. The commit that changed this was confusing and didn't explain things very well, but having looked into it a bit, I think this commit:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/podman/c/68a3dd860b7f391401d5a433aabf060bb2947e08?branch=master

actually starting bundling conmon into podman, but did not remove the 'Requires: conmon' from the spec. So the recent commit was effectively cleaning up an oversight from that commit.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1686636 ***
Comment 7 Lukas Slebodnik 2019-03-12 16:00:17 UTC 
BZ1686636 is for fedora 30 which I do not care.

I'll keep this BZ closed Rawhide.

I would appreciate if you stop changing that.
Comment 8 Adam Williamson 2019-03-12 17:13:51 UTC 
1686636 is for both, and was originally reported for Rawhide, as is explained in it. It's a limitation of Bugzilla that we can't mark reports as affecting multiple releases, but it doesn't mean we need five duplicates of every bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.