Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 169919 (m17n-db-review) - Review Request: m17n-db - multilingualization datafiles
Summary: Review Request: m17n-db - multilingualization datafiles
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: m17n-db-review
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Warren Togami
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL: http://www.m17n.org/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT m17n-lib-review
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-10-05 05:33 UTC by Jens Petersen
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-12 00:49:37 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jens Petersen 2005-10-05 05:33:08 UTC 
Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/m17n-db.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/m17n-db-1.2.0-1.src.rpm 
Description:
m17n-db contains multilingualization (m17n) datafiles for m17n-lib
which describe input maps, encoding maps, and OpenType font data
for many languages.
Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2005-11-09 07:33:20 UTC 
Split some datafiles not needed for input out of the main package
and updated spec and srpm files:

new SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/m17n-db-1.2.0-0.2.src.rpm
Comment 2 Warren Togami 2005-11-10 03:03:24 UTC 
Does every sub-package need to own %{_datadir}/m17n?
Do the sub-packages need the main package that contains /usr/bin/m17n-db and
other stuff?
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2005-11-10 08:06:33 UTC 
> Does every sub-package need to own %{_datadir}/m17n?

Good question.  Since they all require m17n-db, is it superfluous?

> Do the sub-packages need the main package that contains /usr/bin/m17n-db and
> other stuff?

I think m17n-db is just needed to build m17n-lib.  (I suppose it could go in
m17n-db-devel, but that seems to be overdoing it.)

scim-m17n needs the datafiles in m17n-db to work, so that is the reason
they're there.  The others are now in m17n-db-datafiles
Comment 4 Warren Togami 2005-11-10 16:19:09 UTC 
File permissions are all good, I suppose this is good enough for now.  APPROVED
Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2005-11-11 09:50:36 UTC 
Thanks.  Imported into cvs and build requested.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.