the debuginfo package is empty and the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used.

mock build on devel fails with:

RPM build errors:
    File not found:
/var/tmp/gnomebaker-0.5.0-1-root-mockbuild/usr/share/gnome/help/gnomebaker

Update SRPM & spec file to fix problems from comment #1 & comment #2:

Spec: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/gnomebaker/gnomebaker.spec
SRPM: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/gnomebaker/gnomebaker-0.5.0-2.src.rpm

Created attachment 120066 [details]
Build log for gnomebaker-0.5.0-2.src.rpm on Devel

The RPM_OPT_FLAGS are still not used. The following hack makes configure use the
flags:

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 %setup -q
 %patch0 -p1 -b .desktop
 %patch1 -p1 -b .help
+sed -i -e "/^CFLAGS/d" configure.in
 aclocal
 autoconf

Added change from comment #5:

Spec: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/gnomebaker/gnomebaker.spec
SRPM: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/gnomebaker/gnomebaker-0.5.0-3.src.rpm

Created attachment 120164 [details]
Build log for gnomebaker-0.5.0-3.src.rpm on Devel

It builds now on devel; I can install it and start it but I cannot press on any
button in the GUI. The problem seems to be that it cannot find its own callbacks
because I can see many errors like these:

(gnomebaker:8562): libglade-WARNING **: could not find signal handler
'gnomebaker_on_notebook_switch_page'.

(gnomebaker:8562): libglade-WARNING **: could not find signal handler
'gnomebaker_on_preferences'.

(gnomebaker:8562): libglade-WARNING **: could not find signal handler
'gnomebaker_on_format_dvdrw'.

I will try now a build with FC-4 mock and see how that works.

The FC-4 versions doesn't have this problem. Works as expected.

(In reply to comment #8)
Looks like this has been already reported upstream:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1327700&group_id=127397&atid=708499

Hopefully, later this weekend I can get some time to see what the problem is.

Under FC5test2 updated to 22nd Jan, gnomebaker is not looking good. 

[monkey@hailstorm ~]$ gnomebaker

(gnomebaker:23334): Gtk-WARNING **: gtkwidget.c:4205: widget not within a GtkWindow

(gnomebaker:23334): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme directory
16x16/status16x16/stock/chart of theme gnome has no size field

*** glibc detected *** gnomebaker: free(): invalid pointer: 0x09ef6468 ***

[monkey@hailstorm ~]$

this seems to be mostly fixed in CVS. Unable to do a CVS checkout at the moment. 

Ubuntu's drapper source's (CVS 2005-01-10 0.5.1) seem to work. 

Would this be suitable for use (the CVS snapshot)? I can redo the srpm against
it if there is no one else too. 

I'm pretty sure CVS snapshots are acceptable. Be sure that it works otherwise,
though, and is packaged according to the snapshot packaging guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#head-975237cdcb9aa7775601adeaaccbc70290f69812

Luke's gearing up for another release fairly soon, so I'm inclined not to use a
CVS snapshot.  Regardless, I'm probably not gonna have time to look at this for
another week or so.

Understnad, However, I was in need of a CD/DVD burning app and did not want to
use K3b. My preference is for gnomebaker. 

I modified the srpm and spec, bit can be review from here:
http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_stuff/gnomebaker-0.5.1-1.20050110cvs.fc4.src.rpm
http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_stuff/gnomebaker.spec

I appreciate your enthusiasm Michael, but I'm not comfortable with using a cvs
version for it's initial review, given all the changes being made in this version.

Not a problem. Its there, changes for the new version with regards to the
patches and FC5 have been made to the SPEC. 

on fc4 I get:
 rpmbuild -bb gnomebaker.spec
Error: /home/dragoran/rpm/SPECS/gnomebaker.spec:16: parseExpressionBoolean
returns -1
Error: Package has no %description: gnomebaker

%{?dist} was used to seperate buildrequires under fc4 and fc5. 

Please rebuild using --define "dist fc4"

(In reply to comment #19)
> %{?dist} was used to seperate buildrequires under fc4 and fc5. 
> 
> Please rebuild using --define "dist fc4"

The extras buildsystem will define "%{?dist}" as ".fc4" or ".fc5", not just
"fc4" or "fc5".

See the "Conditionals" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag for how
to do distribution-specific builds.

I know. But if you want to rebuild it outside the buildsys, then using the
define flag will be needed. 

I had read that url and spoke with people in #fedora-extras and the method used
was the method suggested. 

Updated package to new version, which fixes the problem with glade.

Spec: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/gnomebaker/gnomebaker.spec
SRPM: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/gnomebaker/gnomebaker-0.5.1-1.src.rpm

Note: This spec is currently set-up for FC5 only (gstreamer08-devel).

Comment on attachment 120164 [details]
Build log for gnomebaker-0.5.0-3.src.rpm on Devel

No longer relevent

* source matches upstream
* rpmlint is happy
* spec looks good
* clean installation and removal
* works as expected
* builds in mock

APPROVED

Packages built, and should be available soon.