Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 172870 - Review Request: fdupes
Summary: Review Request: fdupes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 173080
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Adrian Reber
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-11-10 19:10 UTC by Bastien Nocera
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-18 09:29:42 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
spec patch (961 bytes, patch)
2005-11-11 17:14 UTC, Adrian Reber
no flags Details | Diff
spec patch (1.45 KB, patch)
2005-11-11 17:29 UTC, Adrian Reber
no flags Details | Diff

Description Bastien Nocera 2005-11-10 19:10:29 UTC
Spec Name or Url: http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/spec/fdupes.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/source/fdupes-1.40-1.src.rpm
Description:
FDUPES is a program for identifying or deleting duplicate files residing
within specified directories.

Comment 1 Adrian Reber 2005-11-11 17:10:50 UTC
Will also attach a patch.

Another problem is that fdupes is not GPL as the spec files claims it to be.

Comment 2 Adrian Reber 2005-11-11 17:14:29 UTC
Created attachment 120952 [details]
spec patch

Changes:
- Group didn't exist
- BR were bogus
- BuildRoot changed
- honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS
- using macros not hardcoded paths
- added -p to install to preserve timestamps
- consistent use of RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- correct version in changelog

Comment 3 Bastien Nocera 2005-11-11 17:25:15 UTC
You uploaded the .spec file directly, which has no changes compared to mine...

Comment 4 Adrian Reber 2005-11-11 17:29:15 UTC
Created attachment 120954 [details]
spec patch

another try

Comment 5 Adrian Reber 2005-11-17 18:34:19 UTC
So can this be closed if Simon in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173080 maintains this?

Comment 6 Bastien Nocera 2005-11-18 09:29:42 UTC
Sure thing.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 173080 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.