Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 173550 - Review Request: xfce4-netload-plugin
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-netload-plugin
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Luya Tshimbalanga
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL: http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-11-18 01:48 UTC by Christoph Wickert
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-26 14:04:17 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Christoph Wickert 2005-11-18 01:48:03 UTC
Spec Name or Url: 
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-netload-plugin.spec
SRPM Name or Url: 
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-netload-plugin-0.3.3-2.fc4.src.rpm
Description: 
A network-load monitor plugin for the Xfce panel.

Comments:
rpmlint is clean
License GPL and included

Comment 1 Christoph Wickert 2005-12-01 13:26:53 UTC
- Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs.
- Fix %defattr.

New SRPM:
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-netload-plugin-0.3.3-3.fc4.src.rpm

Comment 2 Luya Tshimbalanga 2006-01-06 21:48:09 UTC
Passed test. Succesfully built via mock. Ready to be rolled on Extras.

Comment 3 Luya Tshimbalanga 2006-01-22 23:13:42 UTC
More detailed review:
+ mock succesfully build the package without noticeable error
+ rpmlint did not report any error nor warning
+ tarball from SRPM matched source tarball for URL listed on SPEC file through
md5 and sha1
+ binary package installed and removed without noticeable issue
+ name of the package/SPEC files follow PackagingGuide and PackageNameGuideline
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines
+ License listed on SPEC file matched the license in the tarball and it is GPL

Accordingly, the package is ready to be included on Fedora Extras.

Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2006-01-26 14:04:17 UTC
Build on all targets succeeded.

CLOSED.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.