Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 173744 - n-u-t-t-c-p great successor to ttcp
Summary: n-u-t-t-c-p great successor to ttcp
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ttcp
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Radek Vokál
QA Contact:
URL: ftp://ftp.lcp.nrl.navy.mil/pub/nuttcp/
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 173823
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-11-20 14:31 UTC by acount closed by user
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-28 14:59:17 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description acount closed by user 2005-11-20 14:31:50 UTC 
ttcp is unmaintained, and n-u-t-t-c-p has more features.


-thanks-
Comment 1 Radek Vokál 2005-11-21 09:30:39 UTC 
It looks far too different from current ttcp. Would be nice to have it in extras
first. I will try to package it later this week.
Comment 2 Radek Vokál 2005-11-21 17:37:25 UTC 
Ok, here is my srpm

http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/nuttcp/nuttcp-5.1.11-1.src.rpm

I will propose it for extras tmrw.
Comment 3 acount closed by user 2005-11-21 18:01:48 UTC 
bugs:

the nuttcp source is included twice into the src.rpm :
-rw-rw-r--  1 xose xose 109601 Jun 28  2004 nuttcp.c
-rw-rw-r--  1 xose xose 109601 Jun 28  2004 nuttcp-v5.1.11.c

nuttcp.cat is not necessary, delete it.

and put xinetd.d directoty into the %doc.


-thanks-
Comment 4 Radek Vokál 2005-11-21 18:34:56 UTC 
New package is here

http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/nuttcp/nuttcp-5.1.11-2.src.rpm

I've put nuttcp xinetd.d file into config section and installed it and others,
nuttcp4 and nuttcp6 into docs. Do you think it's fine?
Comment 5 acount closed by user 2005-11-22 21:41:43 UTC 
Makefile and the "missing" directory(include files) are not necessary. It
compiles clearly with: gcc -W -O2 -Wall nuttcp-v5.1.11.c -o nuttp

debugfiles.list and debugsources.list should be deleted from source.
Comment 6 Radek Vokál 2005-11-28 14:59:17 UTC 
The package is already submitted into Extras. I've removed the .list files but
kept "missing" directory and makefile just to folow upstream for compatibility
(if they want to add stm which will be missing in fedora it will be grabbed from
this directory). Also I did fast clean-up of some warnings to make gcc more happy.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.