Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1745840 - xtl tests fail on armv7hl
Summary: xtl tests fail on armv7hl
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xtl
Version: 32
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Elliott Sales de Andrade
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F-ExcludeArch-ARM
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-08-27 05:09 UTC by Elliott Sales de Andrade
Modified: 2020-02-15 03:04 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: xtl-0.6.12-2.fc32
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-15 03:04:00 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Elliott Sales de Andrade 2019-08-27 05:09:50 UTC 
Description of problem:
xtl tests are broken with gcc 9+ on armv7hl. This used to with on F29 with gcc 8.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xtl-0.6.4


Actual results:
[ RUN      ] xfixed_string.copy_semantic
/builddir/build/BUILD/xtl-0.6.4/test/test_xbasic_fixed_string.cpp:108: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
  s.size()
    Which is: 11
  ref2.size()
    Which is: 9
[  FAILED  ] xfixed_string.copy_semantic (0 ms)

[ RUN      ] xfixed_string.resize
/builddir/build/BUILD/xtl-0.6.4/test/test_xbasic_fixed_string.cpp:409: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
  s2.c_str()
    Which is: "operation"
  "operationaa"
[  FAILED  ] xfixed_string.resize (0 ms)


Expected results:
Tests pass.


Additional info:
Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:58:03 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.
Comment 2 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2020-02-15 03:04:00 UTC 
This has been magically fixed by either gcc 10 or glibc 2.31 in Fedora 32.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.