Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1754167 - FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-ca0457e593 Mako package has broken dependencies on F30
Summary: FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-ca0457e593 Mako package has broken dependencies on F30
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora Modules
Classification: Fedora
Component: sway
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Till Hofmann
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-09-21 12:26 UTC by grumpey0
Modified: 2019-11-07 09:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-07 09:27:46 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description grumpey0 2019-09-21 12:26:17 UTC 
Description of problem:
FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-ca0457e593, Mako package has broken dependencies for Fedora 30. 

During sudo dnf upgrade: 
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package mako-1.4-1.module_
  - nothing provides libsystemd.so.0(LIBSYSTEMD_243)(64bit) needed by mako-1.4-1.module_f32+6140+eb754d2b.x86_64

Package is skipped due to broken dependencies.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-ca0457e593, Mako 1.4-1.module_f32+6140+eb754d2b

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.sudo dnf upgrade 
2.
3.

Actual results:
Mako fails to update. 
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/pB3P-YC4TDTaSjghixXHug
Expected results:
All packages in Module update. 

Additional info:
Comment 1 Till Hofmann 2019-09-22 09:31:41 UTC 
This looks like an odd issue with modules: The package version clearly indicates that this is in fact a F32 package, not a F30 package.

The modulemd file of the F30 build [1] also contains a bunch of F32 packages.

I'll ask on @devel as I have no idea what may be causing this

[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/sway/rolling/3020190912072731.a5b0195c/files/module/modulemd.x86_64.txt
Comment 2 Till Hofmann 2019-09-22 16:15:26 UTC 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/UNIJQMIQQZLIMK55AR3ZNKWKJ2NPS7JP/
Comment 3 grumpey0 2019-09-22 23:38:34 UTC 
Thanks, and THANKS for maintaining this.
Comment 4 Till Hofmann 2019-10-02 08:04:11 UTC 
Should be fixed here:
F30: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-e911cf8bf5
F31: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-96e8adeafa
F29: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-2176bb1faf

Not sure why bodhi didn't add the usual comments automatically.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.